Animal Diversity Web U of M Museum of Zoology ADW Home ADW Home ADW Home University of Michigan Help About Aninal Names Teaching Special Topics About Us




Structured Inquiry Search — preview

Home -> Kingdom Animalia -> Phylum Chordata -> Subphylum Vertebrata -> Class Mammalia -> Infraclass Metatheria

Infraclass Metatheria
marsupial mammals



2009/06/28 03:38:56.910 GMT-4

By Matthew Wund and Phil Myers

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Class: Mammalia
Infraclass: Metatheria
Members of this Infraclass

Diversity

Metatherian mammals, also known as marsupials, comprise around 272 species. They are an ancient group, very diverse in body form, and they occupy an enormous range of ecological niches. Today, most marsupials are found in Central and South America (around 70 species) and Australasia (around 200 species). Radiations took place on both of these continents during the Cenozoic, at a time when there were few placental competitors. Present marsupial faunas are very diverse, with some startling parallels with placental mammals (e.g., marsupials with similar morphologies and life histories as moles, anteaters, shrews, primates, carnivores, and many others). Some marsupial life histories and morphologies are seemingly without placental mammal parallels, for example, kangaroos. Past marsupial faunas were even more incredible. In Australia, for example, were rhinoceros-sized marsupial herbivores, kangaroos nearly 10 feet tall, and carnivorous lion-like forms with shearing teeth and retractile claws. In South America, where parallel radiations of large placental herbivores may have denied these herbivorous niches to marsupials, marsupials filled many carnivore niches (including a sabretooth marsupial "cat") and many rodent-like forms. It seems clear on both continents that invasion by placental mammals is correlated with a decline in number and diversity of marsupials. However, it is unclear whether placental mammals caused the disappearance of marsupials through competition or the apparent pattern of replacement is the result of random historical events. (Moeller, 1990; Nowak, 1991; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000; Wilson and Reeder, 1993)

Geographic Range

Today, most marsupials are found in Central and South America (around 70 species) and Australasia (around 200 species). One species is found in temperate North America (Didelphis virginianus). Metatheres diverged from the lineage leading to eutherian (placental) mammals by the Middle Cretaceous. Early diversification of metatheres is thought to have taken place in North America although, by the middle Miocene, the lineage became extinct on that continent, only reappearing around the time that North and South America regained contact in the Pliocene. The earliest marsupials are believed to have resembled North American opossums and other members of the family Didelphidae. A few fossil marsupials are known from Europe, Africa, and Asia, but this group was never well established on those continents. (Moeller, 1990; Nowak, 1991; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000)

Biogeographic Regions:
nearctic (native ); neotropical (native ); australian (native ).

Habitat

From deserts and dry scrubland in Australia to tropical rain forests in South America, there are at least a few, and often many, species of Metatheria present. These animals occupy an enormous variety of terrestrial habitats throughout these two continents. The single species found in temperate North America (Didelphis virginia) naturally inhabits moist woodlands, but is common in towns and small cities. Metatheres have evolved to fill many niches in many habitats. Many species are fully terrestrial, many are arboreal, and at least one species, yapoks, is semi-aquatic. (Nowak, 1991; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000)

These animals are found in the following types of habitat:
temperate ; tropical ; terrestrial ; freshwater .

Aquatic Biomes:
lakes and ponds; rivers and streams.

Wetlands: swamp .

Systematic and Taxonomic History

Until recently, metatherians were classified in a single order, Marsupialia, with around a dozen families. Improving information on phylogeny, and an effort to make classification better represent the evolutionary history of the group, has led to several schemes that divide metatheres into a number of orders. The one currently followed in the Animal Diversity Web is that proposed by Aplin and Archer (1987) and followed by Wilson and Reeder (1993) in their authoritative summary of the classification of mammals. It divides marsupials into two "cohorts." The cohort Ameridelphia contains two neotropical groups, the families Didelphidae and Caenolestidae, in addition to a number of extinct groups. The cohort Australidelphia contains 16 extant families (including the recently extinct family Thylacinidae), several extinct families, and Microbiotheriidae, a family found only in the Andes of Argentina and Chile. These 18 families are organized into 7 orders. This classification relies heavily on new information from studies of molecular biology, but is increasingly supported by studies of morphology and the fossil record. This is a substantial improvement over the older Marsupialia classification, but we suspect that the last word about the higher taxonomy of marsupials remains to be written. (Aplin and Archer, 1987; Thenius, 1990; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000)

Synonyms
  • Marsupialia
Synapomorphies
  • female reproductive tracts fully doubled
  • male penis doubled
  • development of highly altricial young in a marsupium

Physical Description

Marsupials differ from placental mammals in a number of important and obvious ways. The palate of marsupials is usually "fenestrated," that is, it contains large gaps or spaces in its bony surface. The angular process of the dentary is inflected (bent) medially in almost all marsupials. The braincase is small and narrow. It houses a relatively small and simple brain compared to that of similar-sized placental mammals. The jugal is large, extending posteriorally so that it contacts, and forms part of, the glenoid fossa. The lacrimal canal is slightly anterior to the orbit so that it opens on the surface of the face rather than inside the orbital space. The bullae are sometimes not ossified. When they are, they are formed largely by extensions from the alisphenoid.

Tooth form varies considerably among species of marsupials, but an easy and reliable character for recognizing members of the group is that the number of incisors in the upper jaw is different from the number in the lower (except in one family, the Vombatidae). The number is equal in most (but not all) placental mammals. Also, the maximum number of incisors (seen in several families) is 5/4, in contrast to 3/3 in placentals. The number of premolars and molars also differs between the groups (3/3 4/4 in marsupials, 4/4 3/3 in placental mammals), and the pattern of tooth replacement (milk teeth by adult teeth) differs, but these traits are difficult to use to recognize specimens. Postcranial skeletons of marsupials differ from those of placental mammals in that modern marsupials have epipubic bones in the body wall, projecting anteriorally from the pelvis. Epipubic bones are vestigial in recently extinct thylacines and were absent in at least one extinct group. The presence of epipubic bones is shared with monotremes. (Moeller, 1990; Nowak, 1991; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000)

Distinguishing among most of the orders and families of modern marsupials is not difficult. Two frequently-used characteristics are the conformation of the feet, and the number and position of the lower incisors. The second and third toes of syndactylous species are mostly enclosed in a sheath of skin and appear fused, except for the claws. Members of the orders Peramelemorphia and Diprotodontia are syndactylous. Others have separate toes, sometimes referred to as polydactylous. Members of the Diprotodontia and Paucituberculata have a pair of enlarged, forward-projecting (procumbent) lower incisors, a condition called diprotodonty. Other groups are polyprotodont, with numerous small and unspecialized lower incisors. Marsupial moles (Notoryctemorphia) are an unusual group, probably because of their extreme specialization to a fossorial mode of life. Their incisor morphology is not clearly diprotodont or polyprotodont and their feet are neither polydactylous nor syndactylous. (Moeller, 1990; Nowak, 1991; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000)

Some key physical features:
endothermic ; homoiothermic; bilateral symmetry .

Sexual dimorphism: sexes alike, male larger, sexes colored or patterned differently.

Reproduction

Mating systems of metatheres vary considerably. Many species are solitary throughout the year, only coming together to mate. This pattern of social behavior probably reflects promiscuous mating systems. Males of some species defend their access to several females. Koalas are an example of this polygynous mating behavior. Polygyny can also take the form of male dominance hierarchies in highly social species such as whiptail wallabies, which can live in groups of up to 50 individuals. Monogamy is also present within Metatheria. For example, Petauroides volans live in small family groups that consist of a mated pair and their offspring. (Nowak, 1991)

Marsupials and placental mammals differ strongly in their reproductive anatomy and pattern. In females, the reproductive tracts of marsupials are fully doubled. The right and left vaginae do not fuse to form a single body, as they do in all placental mammals, and birth takes place through a new median canal, the pseudovaginal canal. Right and left uteri also are unfused (varying degrees of fusion are found in placental mammals). Also, in the developing marsupial embryo, the arrangement of ducts that become the female reproductive tract is different in marsupials compared to placentals. In some (but by no means all) species of marsupials, females develop a pouch or marsupium in which the young are nursed. In males, the penis, like the female vagina, is bifid, or doubled. The scrotum lies in front of the penis instead of posterior to it, as in placental mammals. (Moeller, 1990; Parker, 1977; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000)

Perhaps the most conspicuous difference between marsupials and placental mammals is in the degree of development of the young at birth. Marsupial young are tiny at birth; litters always weigh less than 1% of the mother's body weight and individual young sometimes weigh only a few milligrams. They are born after a very short gestation period (8 to 43 days, depending on species; always less or equal to the length of an estrus cycle), and in what seems to our placental-biased point of view to be an extraordinarily underdeveloped state. A placenta is formed in only a few species and, even in those, the gestation period is extraordinarily short. At the time newborn marsupials emerge from their mother's reproductive tract and crawl to the pouch, they are tiny and have just begun forming functional organs. The forelimbs are fairly well developed, as they are required for the young pull to themselves along the mother's belly by grasping hairs with the forelimbs, but the hindlimbs are mere paddles. The heart, kidneys, and lungs are all barely functional. Even the brain is at an early ontogenetic stage. Most development takes place in the pouch and the lactation period is prolonged. (Moeller, 1990; Parker, 1977; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000)

It has been suggested that the marsupial pattern of reproduction is primitive for metatherian and eutherian mammals (Lillegraven, 1975). Lillegraven (1975) argues that marsupial young must be born quickly, before the mother's immune system can respond the presence of foreign tissue in the form of a developing embryo. Most development takes place in the pouch, safe from maternal immune attack. Eutherians "solved" the problem of immune rejection through the evolution of a complex set of interactions that take place in the trophoblast, a part of the developing egg of eutherians that is not found in marsupials. Whether this is likely to be true -- and whether retaining a primitive style of reproduction suggests any kind of competitive inferiority -- has been hotly debated (for example, Parker, 1977). (Lillegraven, 1975; Parker, 1977; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000)

Key reproductive features:
iteroparous ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; viviparous .

Much of development in metatheres occurs after parturition while the young are nursing. In about 50 percent of marsupial species, young develop within the confines of a marsupium, or pouch. Weaning may take place after a year or more in some species (e.g., Macropus). Thus, female metatheres invest very little energy and resources into gestation, but lactation requires a substantial investment. The pouch itself (or protective folds of skin in many species) may be permanent, or may only develop at the onset of reproduction. In either case, resources must be devoted to producing and maintaining the structures that will protect the developing young.

Young generally do not associate directly with their mothers for much more than several weeks once they are fully independent of the pouch. This is generally true for both non-social and social species. In at least one species (Marcopus rufogriseus), extended associations between females and their independent young are known to reduce the success of future reproduction. (Clutton-Brock, 1991; Nowak, 1991; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000)

Parental investment:
altricial ; pre-hatching/birth (provisioning: female); pre-weaning/fledging (provisioning: female, protecting: female); pre-independence (protecting: female); post-independence association with parents.

Lifespan/Longevity

While some species of metatheres live only 1 to a few years, some species, such as coarse-haired wombats, have lived up to 26 years in captivity. ("Marsupials", 1990)

Behavior

Metatheria has undergone two major adaptive radiations (in Australia and South America) and exhibit a vast array of behavior as a consequence of evolving to fill a variety of ecological niches on these two continents. Thus, generalization of their behavior is difficult. Marsupials may be arboreal, terriculous, or fossorial and at least one species is semi-aquatic (yapoks or water opossums). Their locomotion may include walking, gliding, hopping, running and swimming. Marsupials have not evolved powered flight. Activity patterns also run the full spectrum of possibilities: marsupials may be diurnal, nocturnal or crespuscular. Seasonal behavior may include hibernation in some species, while others remain active throughout the year. Some species are social, while others are solitary. (Nowak, 1991; Vaughan, Ryan, and Czaplewski, 2000)

Key behaviors:
arboreal ; scansorial; cursorial; terricolous; fossorial ; glides; saltatorial ; natatorial ; diurnal ; nocturnal ; crepuscular ; motile ; hibernation ; solitary ; territorial ; social .

Communication and Perception

As with mammals in general, vision, olfaction, hearing and touch are all important to varying degrees among species of Metatheria. Communication can take many forms as well. Some marsupials communicate with acoustic signals, particularly during mating or territorial encounters. Many species have conspicuous color patterns that may convey information about sex or species identity. Pheromones may also used in communication of reproductive receptivity. (Nowak, 1991)

Communicates with:
visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical .

Other communication keywords:
pheromones .

Perception channels:
visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical .

Food Habits

Ominivory, insectivory, carnivory, and herbivory are all common food habits among Metatheria. Some groups that exhibit omnivory are American oppossums (Didelphidae), Australian possums (Phalangeridae) and bandicoots (Peramelidae). Insectivory and/or carnivory can be observed in several groups as well (e.g., Dasyuridae). Many marsupials, such as koalas (Phascolarctidae), wombats (Vombatidae), and kangaroos (Macropodidae), are strictly herbivorous. (Nowak, 1991)

Primary Diet:
carnivore (eats terrestrial vertebrates, insectivore , eats non-insect arthropods); herbivore (folivore , nectarivore , frugivore , granivore , lignivore); omnivore .

Predation

Known predators

Except for a very few species (e.g., the extinct thylacine wolf), marsupials are rarely top carnivores and thus are subject to predation by a host of mammalian, reptilian and avian predators wherever they occur.

Ecosystem Roles

With their great diversity of food habits, behavior and habitat use, metatheres can substantially impact their communities and ecosystems in a variety of ways. For example, metatheres may help pollinate plants, distribute seeds, or control pest populations. Most species are prey for other species and thus are an important component of many food webs. Species that dig burrows (e.g. wombats and marsupial moles) create habitat for other organisms and/or help aerate soil. Parasites of marsupials are certainly as diverse as their hosts.

Key ways these animals impact their ecosystem:
disperses seeds; pollinates; creates habitat; soil aeration .

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

Metatheres generally do not have large detrimental effects on human economics. Some herbivorous species may be minor crop pests. Wombats are extirpated in some areas because their burrows cause injury to livestock, or because European rabbits, which have become significant pests in Australia, use wombat burrows as dens. (Nowak, 1991)

Ways that these animals might be a problem for humans:
crop pest.

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

Humans benefit from metatheres in a variety of ways. Many are eaten as food or their body parts are used as some sort of resource (e.g., leather is made from kangaroo hides and koalas and brushtail possums were once taken for their fur). Some species that eat mice or insects can help control agricultural pests. Metatheres are valuable for the ecotourism industry--drawing many tourists to Australia. Some species are even kept as pets (e.g. Petaurus outside of Australia). (Nowak, 1991)

Ways that people benefit from these animals:
pet trade ; food ; body parts are source of valuable material; ecotourism ; controls pest population.

Conservation

Many marsupials are threatened or endangered. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) currently lists over 200 species (i.e., more than 2/3 of all marsupials) as being of some level of concern. Habitat destruction, overexploitation, and competition with exotic species and livestock have greatly reduced many populations. A number of species have gone extinct within the past two centuries as a direct result of human activity (e.g., Thylacinus, Macropus spp.). (IUCN, 2004; Nowak, 1991)

Contributors

Matthew Wund (author), University of Michigan. Phil Myers (author), Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan.
Tanya Dewey (editor), Animal Diversity Web, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.

References

1990. Marsupials. Pp. 210-211 in B. Grzimek, ed. Grzimek's Encyclopedia of Mammals, Vol. 1, 1st Edition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.

Aplin, K., M. Archer. 1987. Recent advances in marsupial systematics with a new syncretic classification. Pp. xv-lxxii in M. Archer, ed. Possums and Opossums: Studies in Evolution, Vol. 1. Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty and Sons PTY Limited.

Clutton-Brock, T. 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

IUCN, 2004. "2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species" (On-line). Accessed October 19, 2005 at http://www.iucnredlist.org.

Lillegraven, J. 1975. Biological considerations of the marsupial-placental dichotomy. Evolution, 29: 707.

Moeller, H. 1990. Marsupials: Introduction. Pp. 212-219 in B. Grzimek, ed. Grzimek's Encyclopedia of Mammals, Vol. 1, 1st Edition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.

Nowak, R. 1991. Order Marsupialia. Pp. 10-113 in Walker's Mammals of the World, Vol. 1, 5th Edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Parker, P. 1977. An ecological comparison of marsupial and placental patterns of reproduction. B. Stonehouse, D. Gilmore, eds. The Biology of Marsupials. London: T. Macmillan.

Thenius, E. 1990. Marsupials: Phylogeny. Pp. 219-231 in B. Grzimek, ed. Grzimek's Encyclopedia of Mammals, Vol. 1, 1st Edition. New York: m.

Vaughan, T., J. Ryan, N. Czaplewski. 2000. Mammalogy, 4th Edition. Toronto: Brooks Cole.

Wilson, D., D. Reeder. 1993. Mammal Species of the World, A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. 2nd edition. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

2009/06/28 03:39:00.638 GMT-4

To cite this page: Wund, M. and P. Myers. 2006. "Metatheria" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed July 05, 2009 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Metatheria.html.

Disclaimer: The Animal Diversity Web is an educational resource written largely by and for college students. ADW doesn't cover all species in the world, nor does it include all the latest scientific information about organisms we describe. Though we edit our accounts for accuracy, we cannot guarantee all information in those accounts. While ADW staff and contributors provide references to books and websites that we believe are reputable, we cannot necessarily endorse the contents of references beyond our control.

Other formats: OWL

Home  ¦  About Us  ¦  Special Topics  ¦  Teaching  ¦  About Animal Names  ¦  Help

Structured Inquiry Search — preview