Cebus capucinuswhite-faced capuchin

Ge­o­graphic Range

Cebus ca­puci­nus is na­tive to Cen­tral Amer­ica in the Neotrop­i­cal Re­gion. They are found in Hon­duras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, and along the coast of Co­lum­bia and Ecuador. Some in­di­vid­u­als have been re­ported as far south as Ar­gentina. This species has one of the widest ranges of all New World mon­keys. (Estrada, et al., 2006; Grz­imek and Gold, 2004; Kinzey, 1997; Miller, 2002; Moyni­han, 1976; Perry, 2003; Richard, 1985; Smuts, et al., 1987; Wolfheim, 1983)

Habi­tat

White-faced ca­puchins are highly adapt­able and oc­cupy a wide range of habi­tats. They live in a va­ri­ety of wet, dry, pri­mary, and sec­ondary forests, but pre­fer trop­i­cal ever­greens and dry de­cid­u­ous forests. White-faced ca­puchins have a pref­er­ence for close-canopied forests up to as high as 2100 m but mainly oc­cupy the mid­dle strata around 1100 m. They are com­mon in areas high in hu­mid­ity and well-drained low­lands. Oc­ca­sion­ally, they have been found in vol­canic foothills and coastal plains. (Eisen­berg, 1989; Estrada, et al., 2006; Grz­imek and Gold, 2004; Kinzey, 1997; Wolfheim, 1983)

  • Range elevation
    0 to 2100 m
    0.00 to 6889.76 ft
  • Average elevation
    1100 m
    3608.92 ft

Phys­i­cal De­scrip­tion

White-faced ca­puchins have dis­tinc­tive mark­ings that dis­tin­guish them from other ca­puchin mon­keys. Their dor­sum and hindquar­ters are solid black, while the upper chest, fore­arms, and the fur around the face are white. They have tan-col­ored fa­cial skin and a black cap on their heads. White-faced ca­puchins have pre­hen­sile tails, used for grasp­ing and car­ry­ing food and for added pos­tural sup­port. They reach their full adult size by age 8. Males weigh be­tween 3 and 4 kg and fe­males weigh be­tween 2 and 3 kg. This is the great­est de­gree of sex­ual di­mor­phism among the ca­puchins. They are pri­mar­ily quadrupedal, but are also ex­cel­lent leapers and climbers. (Eisen­berg, 1989; Estrada, et al., 2006; Ger­ber and Rehg, 1999; Grz­imek and Gold, 2004; Kinzey, 1997; Moyni­han, 1976; Smuts, et al., 1987)

  • Sexual Dimorphism
  • male larger
  • Range mass
    2 to 4 kg
    4.41 to 8.81 lb
  • Range length
    435 (high) mm
    17.13 (high) in

Re­pro­duc­tion

White-faced ca­puchins are polyg­a­mous, with males and fe­males hav­ing mul­ti­ple part­ners. There is a dom­i­nance hi­er­ar­chy among males, with alpha males hav­ing more mat­ing op­por­tu­ni­ties. How­ever, sub­or­di­nate males are also al­lowed to mate. Alpha males spend a large por­tion of their time en­gaged in de­ter­ring preda­tors and males from out­side groups. Pro­vid­ing his group with this pro­tec­tion gives the alpha male prece­dence over the other males in mat­ing op­por­tu­ni­ties. Males and fe­males en­gage in a set of spe­cific vo­cal­iza­tions, fa­cial ex­pres­sions, and pos­tures be­fore cop­u­la­tion. (Eisen­berg, 1989; Estrada, et al., 2006; Grz­imek and Gold, 2004; Kinzey, 1997; Smuts, et al., 1987)

Fe­males give birth to a sin­gle off­spring at about 2 year in­ter­vals. Breed­ing is sea­sonal, with peak fe­male fer­til­ity from Jan­u­ary to April. Mat­ing oc­curs out­side of these months but rarely re­sults in con­cep­tions. Ges­ta­tion last for an av­er­age of 160 days. Adult fe­males be­come sex­u­ally ma­ture around age 4, but typ­i­cally don't give birth until age 7. Males be­come sex­u­ally ma­ture at 7 to 10 years old. (Eisen­berg, 1989; Estrada, et al., 2006; Kinzey, 1997; Smuts, et al., 1987)

  • Breeding interval
    White-faced capuchins breed year-round, though females only conceive once every 2 years, on average.
  • Breeding season
    Peak breeding is between January and April.
  • Range number of offspring
    1 (high)
  • Average number of offspring
    1
  • Range gestation period
    157 to 167 days
  • Average gestation period
    160 days
  • Range weaning age
    2 to 4 months
  • Range time to independence
    4 to 8 years
  • Average time to independence
    7 years
  • Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
    4 to 7 years
  • Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
    5 years
  • Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)
    7 to 10 years
  • Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)
    8 years

Pri­mary care for in­fants is pro­vided by the mother. Fe­males carry, pro­tect, and feed the young until they are able to take care of them­selves. Males do not help with care of in­fants, but may as­sist young in the so­cial hi­er­ar­chy once they are in­de­pen­dent. Alpha males help to pro­tect mem­bers of their group from in­trud­ers and preda­tors. (Eisen­berg, 1989; Estrada, et al., 2006; Kinzey, 1997)

  • Parental Investment
  • altricial
  • pre-fertilization
    • provisioning
    • protecting
      • female
  • pre-hatching/birth
    • provisioning
      • female
    • protecting
      • female
  • pre-weaning/fledging
    • provisioning
      • female
    • protecting
      • male
      • female
  • pre-independence
    • provisioning
      • female
    • protecting
      • male
      • female
  • post-independence association with parents
  • extended period of juvenile learning

Lifes­pan/Longevity

White-faced ca­puchin max­i­mum lifes­pan in cap­tiv­ity is 55 years. Wild lifes­pan may be less than half of that. Fac­tors such as pre­da­tion, dis­ease, and in­fec­tion from wounds sus­tained while fight­ing are all re­spon­si­ble for many deaths each year. Tree re­moval, log­ging, and clearcut­ting are in­di­rectly the lead­ing cause of white-face ca­puchin death by dras­ti­cally re­duc­ing suit­able habi­tats. (Eisen­berg, 1989; Estrada, et al., 2006; Grz­imek and Gold, 2004; Smuts, et al., 1987; Wolfheim, 1983)

  • Range lifespan
    Status: captivity
    55 (high) years
  • Typical lifespan
    Status: wild
    30 (high) years
  • Typical lifespan
    Status: captivity
    45 (high) years

Be­hav­ior

White-faced ca­puchins are highly so­cial and live in multi male - multi fe­male groups of 18 to 20. Fe­males are philopatric and stay with the group they are born into; males leave around age 4 to find a place in a new group. White-faced ca­puchins are di­ur­nal pri­mates and are very ac­tive dur­ing the day. They sleep at night. White-faced ca­puchins are play­ful and in­quis­i­tive, they play ex­ten­sively and are es­pe­cially in­ter­ested in tak­ing things apart. This be­hav­ior is more fre­quently ob­served in cap­tive set­tings but also oc­curs in the wild. White-faced ca­puchins are en­er­getic and ac­tive. So­cial play is com­mon among all group mem­bers, es­pe­cially ju­ve­niles, who spend con­sid­er­able amount of time play­ing and wrestling. Ju­ve­niles also rely heav­ily on so­cial learn­ing; ob­serv­ing adults to learn es­sen­tial be­hav­iors and skills. (Kinzey, 1997; Moyni­han, 1976; Perry, 2003; Richard, 1985; Smuts, et al., 1987)

  • Average territory size
    0.8 km^2

Home Range

White-faced ca­puchins have a home range of ap­prox­i­mately 80 ha or 0.8 square km. They de­fend ter­ri­to­ries against other ca­puchins. When an in­truder is no­ticed in­di­vid­u­als will give an alarm call and the group will ei­ther flee or swarm the in­truder. In 100 sq. km of Santa Rosa Park there are be­tween 250 and 350 white-faced ca­puchins. (Kinzey, 1997; Moyni­han, 1976; Perry, 2003; Smuts, et al., 1987)

Com­mu­ni­ca­tion and Per­cep­tion

White-faced ca­puchins are highly so­cial and com­mu­ni­ca­tion is very im­por­tant. In­di­vid­u­als spend a great deal of time in so­cial bond­ing and es­tab­lish­ing trust. And ex­am­ple is hand-sniff­ing, where one mon­key will stick his/her fin­gers in the other mon­key's nose and then other mon­key re­peats the ac­tiv­ity. This can last for sev­eral min­utes and is done with a trance-like ex­pres­sion. They may also suck on each other's fin­gers and tails for long pe­ri­ods of time. White-faced ca­puchins also play mouth games, where one in­di­vid­ual will in­sert some­thing into their mouth, whether it be the other mon­key's fin­ger, a patch of fur, or some inan­i­mate ob­ject. The ob­ject of this game is to pry the item out of the oth­ers mouth, and then the ob­ject is ei­ther placed back in the mouth to start a new game, or they take turns and switch roles. When preda­tors ap­proach, white-faced ca­puchins use trill vo­cal­iza­tions to co­or­di­nate move­ment in the group. A dif­fer­ent alarm call is used to alert oth­ers that a preda­tor or in­truder in nearby. (Kinzey, 1997; Perry, 2003; Radick, 2007)

  • Other Communication Modes
  • mimicry

Food Habits

White-faced ca­puchins eat a wide va­ri­ety of plants and an­i­mals. Their pri­mary diet is a va­ri­ety of fruits and nuts, but in­sects, other in­ver­te­brates, and small ver­te­brates are taken op­por­tunis­ti­cally. Ver­te­brates eaten in­clude squir­rels, tree rats, lizards, and birds. The diet varies re­gion­ally and sea­son­ally, but gen­er­ally con­sists of about 50 to 80% fruit, 20 to 30% an­i­mal ma­te­r­ial, and 10% other plant ma­te­r­ial. White-faced ca­puchins eat fre­quently and are ad­ven­tur­ous in their food choices. They will try al­most any­thing once and learn through trial and error about what is ed­i­ble or de­sir­able. One study showed that they ate 63 dif­fer­ent plant species from 34 fam­i­lies at Santa Rosa Park. They are ex­cel­lent for­agers from a very young age. As young as 1 year old they are able to seek out food al­most as well as adults, their only lim­i­ta­tions being size and strength. (Chap­man and Fedi­gan, 1990; Estrada, et al., 2006; Kinzey, 1997; Miller, 2002; Moyni­han, 1976)

  • Animal Foods
  • birds
  • mammals
  • amphibians
  • reptiles
  • insects
  • terrestrial non-insect arthropods
  • Plant Foods
  • seeds, grains, and nuts
  • fruit
  • flowers
  • sap or other plant fluids

Pre­da­tion

The most com­mon preda­tors of white-face ca­puchins are snakes, es­pe­cially tree boas (Coral­lus) and lance­heads (Both­rops). Caimans, cats, such as jaguars and ocelots and large rap­tors, such as harpy ea­gles, also prey on these ca­puchins. White-face ca­puchins sound alarm calls when they spot a preda­tor. Liv­ing in tight-knit so­cial groups helps them to stay vig­i­lant against preda­tors. Groups threat­ened by a preda­tor will ei­ther flee or mob the preda­tor. (Miller, 2002; Perry, 2003)

  • Anti-predator Adaptations
  • cryptic

Ecosys­tem Roles

White-faced ca­puchins play an im­por­tant role in seed dis­per­sal, in­flu­enc­ing for­est re­gen­er­a­tion. Blood-born ne­ma­tode (round­worm) par­a­sites of this mon­key in­clude: Mi­cro­fi­laria pana­men­sis, Tetrapetalonema pana­men­sis, and Dipetalonema ob­tusa. (Chap­man and Fedi­gan, 1990; Em­mons, 1990; Esslinger, 1966; Esslinger, 1979; Grz­imek and Gold, 2004; Nowak, 1991; Sem­ple, et al., 2002)

  • Ecosystem Impact
  • disperses seeds
Com­men­sal/Par­a­sitic Species
  • Mi­cro­fi­laria pana­men­sis
  • Tetrapetalonema pana­men­sis
  • Dipetalonema ob­tusa

Eco­nomic Im­por­tance for Hu­mans: Pos­i­tive

White-face ca­puchins are hunted for food and com­monly kept as pets and col­lected in zoos. Most ca­puchins in zoos are bred in cap­tiv­ity; few are from the wild. (Em­mons, 1990; Nowak, 1991)

Eco­nomic Im­por­tance for Hu­mans: Neg­a­tive

White-faced ca­puchins can be car­ri­ers of var­i­ous dis­eases while in the wild, and be­cause they are caught for the pet trade, these dis­ease can be trans­mit­ted to hu­mans. White-faced ca­puchins are known car­ri­ers of malaria and mi­cro­fi­laria. These dis­eases ap­pear to be more preva­lent in in­fants and ju­ve­niles, pos­si­bly be­cause of their weaker im­mune sys­tems. White-faced ca­puchins can also eat fruit crops. (Em­mons, 1990; Esslinger, 1966; Nowak, 1991; Porter, Jr., et al., 1966; Sem­ple, et al., 2002)

Con­ser­va­tion Sta­tus

White-face ca­puchins are wide­spread and their pop­u­la­tions are not cur­rently con­sid­ered threat­ened. The main pres­sures they face are habi­tat degra­da­tion, de­for­esta­tion, and being hunted for food. (Grz­imek and Gold, 2004)

Con­trib­u­tors

Tanya Dewey (ed­i­tor), An­i­mal Di­ver­sity Web.

John Long (au­thor), Rad­ford Uni­ver­sity, Karen Pow­ers (ed­i­tor, in­struc­tor), Rad­ford Uni­ver­sity.

Glossary

Neotropical

living in the southern part of the New World. In other words, Central and South America.

World Map

acoustic

uses sound to communicate

altricial

young are born in a relatively underdeveloped state; they are unable to feed or care for themselves or locomote independently for a period of time after birth/hatching. In birds, naked and helpless after hatching.

arboreal

Referring to an animal that lives in trees; tree-climbing.

bilateral symmetry

having body symmetry such that the animal can be divided in one plane into two mirror-image halves. Animals with bilateral symmetry have dorsal and ventral sides, as well as anterior and posterior ends. Synapomorphy of the Bilateria.

causes or carries domestic animal disease

either directly causes, or indirectly transmits, a disease to a domestic animal

chemical

uses smells or other chemicals to communicate

cryptic

having markings, coloration, shapes, or other features that cause an animal to be camouflaged in its natural environment; being difficult to see or otherwise detect.

diurnal
  1. active during the day, 2. lasting for one day.
dominance hierarchies

ranking system or pecking order among members of a long-term social group, where dominance status affects access to resources or mates

endothermic

animals that use metabolically generated heat to regulate body temperature independently of ambient temperature. Endothermy is a synapomorphy of the Mammalia, although it may have arisen in a (now extinct) synapsid ancestor; the fossil record does not distinguish these possibilities. Convergent in birds.

fertilization

union of egg and spermatozoan

food

A substance that provides both nutrients and energy to a living thing.

forest

forest biomes are dominated by trees, otherwise forest biomes can vary widely in amount of precipitation and seasonality.

frugivore

an animal that mainly eats fruit

herbivore

An animal that eats mainly plants or parts of plants.

iteroparous

offspring are produced in more than one group (litters, clutches, etc.) and across multiple seasons (or other periods hospitable to reproduction). Iteroparous animals must, by definition, survive over multiple seasons (or periodic condition changes).

mimicry

imitates a communication signal or appearance of another kind of organism

motile

having the capacity to move from one place to another.

native range

the area in which the animal is naturally found, the region in which it is endemic.

omnivore

an animal that mainly eats all kinds of things, including plants and animals

pet trade

the business of buying and selling animals for people to keep in their homes as pets.

polygynandrous

the kind of polygamy in which a female pairs with several males, each of which also pairs with several different females.

rainforest

rainforests, both temperate and tropical, are dominated by trees often forming a closed canopy with little light reaching the ground. Epiphytes and climbing plants are also abundant. Precipitation is typically not limiting, but may be somewhat seasonal.

riparian

Referring to something living or located adjacent to a waterbody (usually, but not always, a river or stream).

seasonal breeding

breeding is confined to a particular season

sedentary

remains in the same area

sexual

reproduction that includes combining the genetic contribution of two individuals, a male and a female

social

associates with others of its species; forms social groups.

tactile

uses touch to communicate

terrestrial

Living on the ground.

tropical

the region of the earth that surrounds the equator, from 23.5 degrees north to 23.5 degrees south.

visual

uses sight to communicate

viviparous

reproduction in which fertilization and development take place within the female body and the developing embryo derives nourishment from the female.

Ref­er­ences

Chap­man, C., L. Fedi­gan. 1990. Di­etary Dif­fer­ences be­tween Neigh­bor­ing Cebus Ca­puci­nus Groups: Local tra­di­tions, Food avail­abil­ity or re­sponses to food prof­itabil­ity. Folia Pri­ma­to­log­ica, 54/3-4: 177-186.

Eimerl, S., I. De­Vore. 1965. The Pri­mates. New York: Time-Life Books.

Eisen­berg, J. 1989. Mam­mals of the Neotrop­ics. Chicago: Uni­ver­sity of Chicago Press.

Em­mons, L. 1990. Neotrop­i­cal Rain­for­est Mam­mals. Chicago and Lon­don: The Uni­ver­sity of Chicago Press.

Esslinger, J. 1966. Dipetalonema ob­tusa (McCoy, 1936) comb. n. (Fi­lar­i­oidea: On­chocer­ci­dae) in Colom­bian Pri­mates, with a De­scrip­tion of the Adult. The Jour­nal of Par­a­sitol­ogy, 52/3: pp. 498-502.

Esslinger, J. 1979. Tetrapetalonema (T.) pana­men­sis (McCoy, 1936) comb. n. (Fi­lar­i­oidea: On­chocer­ci­dae) in Colom­bian Pri­mates, with a De­scrip­tion of the Adults. Jour­nal of Par­a­sitol­ogy, 65/6: 924-927.

Estrada, A., P. Gar­ber, M. Pavelka, L. Luecke. 2006. New per­spec­tives in the study of Mesoamer­i­can pri­mates : dis­tri­b­u­tion, ecol­ogy, be­hav­ior, and con­ser­va­tion. New York: Springer.

Ger­ber, P., J. Rehg. 1999. The Eco­log­i­cal Role of the Pre­hen­sile Tail in White-Faced Ca­puchins (Cebus ca­puci­nus). Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Phys­i­cal An­thro­pol­ogy, Vol­ume: 110 Issue: 3: 325-339.

Grz­imek, B., K. Gold. 2004. New World mon­keys I: Squir­rel mon­keys and ca­puchins. Pp. 101-113 in Grz­imek's An­i­mal Life En­cy­clo­pe­dia, Vol. 14, 2nd Edi­tion. Farm­ing­ton Hills, Mi: Gale.

Kinzey, W. 1997. New World pri­mates : ecol­ogy, evo­lu­tion, and be­hav­ior. New York: Al­dine de Gruyter.

Miller, L. 2002. Eat or be Eaten: Preda­tor Sen­si­tive For­ag­ing Among Pri­mates. United King­dom: Cam­bridge Uni­ver­sity Press.

Moyni­han, M. 1976. The New World Pri­mates: adap­tive ra­di­a­tion and the evo­lu­tion of so­cial be­hav­ior, lan­guages, and in­tel­li­gence. Prince­ton, NJ: Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity Press.

Nowak, R. 1991. Walker's Mam­mals of the World, Fifth Edi­tion. Bal­ti­more and Lon­don: Johns Hop­kins Uni­ver­sity Press.

Perry, S. 2003. In The Bi­ol­ogy of Tra­di­tions: Mod­els and Ev­i­dence. Cam­bridge: Uni­ver­sity of Cam­r­bridge Press. Ac­cessed Sep­tem­ber 13, 2008 at http://​www.​eva.​mpg.​de/​phylogen/​pdf/​chapter.​pdf.

Porter, Jr., J., C. John­son, L. De Sousa. 1966. Preva­lence of Malaria in Pana­man­ian Pri­mates. The Jour­nal of Par­a­sitol­ogy, Vol. 52, No. 4: pp. 669-670. Ac­cessed De­cem­ber 10, 2008 at http://​www.​jstor.​org/​stable/​3276426?&​Search=yes&​term=%22cebus+capucinus%22&​term=%22parasite%22&​list=hide&​searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2522cebus%2Bcapucinus%2522%2B%2522parasite%2522%26gw%3Djtx%26prq%3D%2522cebus%2Bcapucinus%2522%2B%2522crop%2Bpest%2522%26Search%3DSearch%26hp%3D25%26wc%3Don&​item=1&​ttl=58&​returnArticleService=showArticle.

Radick, G. 2007. The Simian Tongue: The Long De­bate about An­i­mal Lan­guage. Chicago and Lon­don: The Uni­ver­sity of Chicago Press.

Richard, A. 1985. Pri­mates In Na­ture. United States: W. H. Free­man and Com­pany.

Sem­ple, S., P. Ben­nett, G. Cowlishaw. 2002. Im­mune Sys­tem Evo­lu­tion among An­thro­poid Pri­mates: Par­a­sites, In­juries and Preda­tors. Pro­ceed­ings: Bi­o­log­i­cal Sci­ences, Vol. 269, No. 1495: pp. 1031-1037. Ac­cessed De­cem­ber 10, 2008 at http://​www.​jstor.​org/​stable/​3068185?&​Search=yes&​term=cebus&​term=parasite&​term=capucinus&​list=hide&​searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dcebus%2Bcapucinus%2Bparasite%26x%3D0%26y%3D0%26wc%3Don&​item=1&​ttl=63&​returnArticleService=showArticle.

Smuts, B., D. Ch­eney, R. Sey­farth, R. Wrang­ham, T. Struh­saker. 1987. Pri­mate So­ci­eties. United States: The Uni­ver­sity of Chicago Press.

Strier, K. 2003. Pri­mate Be­hav­ioral Ecol­ogy. United States: Allyn and Bacon.

Walker, E. 1954. The Mon­key Book. New York: The Macmil­lan Com­pany.

Wolfheim, J. 1983. Pri­mates of the world: dis­tri­b­u­tion, abun­dance, and con­ser­va­tion. Seat­tle, Wash­ing­ton: Uni­ver­sity of Wash­ing­ton Press.