Crossaster papposus

Ge­o­graphic Range

North At­lantic and Pa­cific Coasts: (Him­mel­man and Dutil, 1991) One can find C. pap­po­sus from Alaska to Puget Sound, from the Artic to the Gulf of Maine. (MCon­naughey and Mc­Connaighey, 1985) It is com­mon in British wa­ters and in east­ern Maine and can often be found in the lower in­ter­tidal zone from the East­port area north­ward. (Hay­ward and Ry­land, 1995)

Habi­tat

Crossas­ter pap­po­sus is found on rock bot­toms, rang­ing from the low tide line to ap­prox­i­mately 1080' (329m) deep. (Mc­Connaughey and Mc­Connaughey, 1985) It is tol­er­ant of strong sun­light. (Cole­man, 1991)

Phys­i­cal De­scrip­tion

Crossas­ter pap­po­sus ranges from 8" to 14" in di­am­e­ter. It has many arms (be­tween 8 and 14) the length of one-half its ra­dius. It is scar­let on top with con­cen­tric bands of white, pink, yel­low, or dark red, and it is white on the un­der­side. Its en­tire upper sur­face is sparsely cov­ered with brush­like bris­tles. (Mc­Connaughey and Mc­Connaughey, 1985) These bris­tles, called pseudopax­il­lae, con­sist of bun­dles of fine spines atop short stumps. The mouth area is bare, and it has two rows of sucker-tipped sen­sory tube feet. (Gos­ner, 1978)

Re­pro­duc­tion

Crossas­ter pap­po­sus, like most sea stars, has sep­a­rate sexes, and fer­til­iza­tion is ex­ter­nal. (Hick­man and Roberts, 1995) Sex­ual re­pro­duc­tion pro­duces lecithotropic larva in late win­ter. One-year-old in­di­vid­u­als mea­sure 1.8 to 4.0 cm in di­am­e­ter, and there is a 2 cm an­nual growth in­cre­ment dur­ing the fol­low­ing few years. (Him­mel­man and Dutil, 1991) Ju­ve­nile C. pap­po­sus tend to pre­fer sed­i­ment bot­toms of the sea. Upon grow­ing to 5cm in di­am­e­ter, C. pap­po­sus mi­grates to shal­low water (4-8cm in di­am­e­ter) and then, with in­creas­ing size, it grad­u­ally moves to greater depths. (Him­mel­man and Dutil, 1991) Like other sea stars, C. pap­po­sus can re­gen­er­ate in­jured or miss­ing arms, as long as a por­tion of the cen­tral disc, where the arms con­verge, is in­tact. (Hick­man and Roberts, 1995)

Be­hav­ior

C. pap­po­sus is highly mo­bile. Large in­di­vid­u­als can cover dis­tances of >5 me­ters in 12 hours. (Him­mel­man and Dutil, 1991) C. pap­po­sus has been found to dis­perse widely in order to for­age for its mo­bile prey. As a dom­i­nant preda­tor high in its food web, C. pap­po­sus has also been in­flu­en­tial in dis­per­sal of com­peti­tors, af­fect­ing dis­tri­b­u­tion of these other as­ter­oid species. (Sloan, 1979) When hun­gry, C. pap­po­sus maeks con­tact with its prey, re­tracts its sen­sory tube feet, then pro­tracts its tube feet to gain height over the prey. This en­ables it then to "pounce" on its vic­tim, where­upon C. pap­po­sus swal­lows small prey whole or cov­ers large, ses­sile prey with its body and en­gulfs it with its evert­ible stom­ach. (Cole­man, 1991) (Mc­Connaughey and Mc­Connaughey, 1985) (Sloan, 1980) De­fense re­sponses of C. pap­po­sus are not much stud­ied, but it has been ob­served that these starfish re­stract their sen­sory tube feet as a de­fen­sive re­sponse. (Sloan, 1980)

Chemore­cep­tion abil­i­ties have also been ob­served in C. pap­po­sus. It shows a wide va­ri­ety of re­sponses to crude ex­tract of prey species and con­specifics. Crossas­ter pap­po­sus has the ol­fac­tory (dis­tance chemore­cep­tion) abil­ity to sense whole, live po­ten­tial prey and con­specifics. (Sloan and North­way, 1982)

Food Habits

In its habi­tat, C. pap­po­sus is con­sid­ered to be the dom­i­nant preda­tor, along with So­laster en­dece, an­other species of preda­cious sea star. As a dom­i­nant preda­tor, C. pap­po­sus plays an im­por­tant role in de­ter­min­ing com­mu­nity struc­ture. (Him­mel­man and Dutil, 1991) Its abun­dance and fre­quent preda­tory ac­tiv­ity sug­gests that it be­longs to an im­por­tant preda­tory guild. C. pap­po­sus has often been ob­served feed­ing on urchins, as well as on nu­mer­ous other in­ver­te­brates, in­clud­ing echin­o­derms, bi­valves, cnidar­i­ans, and tu­ni­cates. (Cole­man, 1991) Can­ni­bal­ism in C. pap­po­sus is rare, ob­served only after long star­va­tion in cap­tiv­ity. (Sloan, 1984)

Eco­nomic Im­por­tance for Hu­mans: Pos­i­tive

Un­for­tu­nately, in­for­ma­tion re­gard­ing the eco­nomic im­por­tance of C. pap­po­sus and its value to hu­mans is ei­ther not well-stud­ied, not well-doc­u­mented, or sim­ply in­ac­ces­si­ble. As an ag­gres­sive preda­tor high on its food web and as an agent of dis­per­sal of both its com­peti­tors and prey, C. pap­po­sus clearly has a sig­nif­i­cant im­pact on its ecosys­tem.

Other Com­ments

Among the most beau­ti­ful of echin­o­derms, C. pap­po­sus is a bright spot of color in North At­lantic and Pa­cific wa­ters. It can be read­ily rec­og­nized and dif­fer­en­ti­ated from other sea stars in that it has sev­eral more than the stan­dard num­ber or tube feet (five). (Hick­man and Roberts, 1995)

Con­trib­u­tors

Heather Grush (au­thor), Uni­ver­sity of Michi­gan-Ann Arbor.

Glossary

Atlantic Ocean

the body of water between Africa, Europe, the southern ocean (above 60 degrees south latitude), and the western hemisphere. It is the second largest ocean in the world after the Pacific Ocean.

World Map

Pacific Ocean

body of water between the southern ocean (above 60 degrees south latitude), Australia, Asia, and the western hemisphere. This is the world's largest ocean, covering about 28% of the world's surface.

World Map

coastal

the nearshore aquatic habitats near a coast, or shoreline.

ectothermic

animals which must use heat acquired from the environment and behavioral adaptations to regulate body temperature

native range

the area in which the animal is naturally found, the region in which it is endemic.

Ref­er­ences

Cole­man, N., 1991. En­cy­clo­pe­dia of Ma­rine An­i­mals, Harper Collins Pub­lish­ers, New York, 161.

Gos­ner, K.L., 1978. At­lantic Seashore: Pe­ter­son Field Guides. Houghton Mif­flin Com­pany, New York, 260-1.

Hay­wood, P.J., and Ry­land, J.S., 1995. Hand­book of the Ma­rine Fauna of North­west Eu­rope, Ox­ford Uni­ver­sity Press, 668.

Hick­man, C.P., and Roberts, L.S., 1995. An­i­mal Di­ver­sity, Wm. C. Brown Com­mu­ni­ca­tions, Inc., Dubuque, IA, 228-232.

Him­mel­man, J.H., and Dutil, C., 1991. "Dis­tri­b­u­tion, pop­u­la­tion struc­ture and feed­ing of sub­ti­dal seast­ars in the north­ern Gulf of St. Lawrence, Ma­rine Ecol­ogy Press Se­ries, Vol. 76, 61-72.

Mc­Connaughey, B.H., and E., 1985. Pa­cific Coast: The Audubon So­ci­ety Na­ture Guides, Chan­ti­cleer Press, New York, 373, 462.

Sloan, N.A., 1984. "In­ter­fer­ence and Ag­gre­ga­tion: Close En­coun­ters of the Starfish Kind, Ophe­lia, Vo. 23, No. 1, 23-31.

Sloan, N.A., and North­way, S.M., 1982. "Chemore­cep­tion by the As­ter­oid Crossas­ter pap­po­sus," Jour­nal of Ex­per­i­men­tal Ma­rine Bi­ol­ogy and Ecol­ogy, Vol. 61, No. 1, 85-98.

Sloan, N.A., 1980. "The arm curl­ing and ter­mi­nal tube-foot re­sponses of the as­ter­oid Crossas­ter pap­po­sus," Jour­nal of Nat­ural His­tory, Vol. 14, No. 4, 469-482.

Sloan, N.A., 1979. "Starfish en­coun­ters: An ex­per­i­men­tal study of its ad­van­tages," Ex­pe­ri­en­tia (Basel), Vol. 35, No. 10, 1314-15.