By Jeremie Marko
Geographic Range
Little red flying foxes (Pteropus scapulatus) are primarily found in Australia and have the largest distribution of any other member of the genus Pteropus within Australia. Occasionally, these bats have been seen as far away as Papua New Guinea. There has also been one sighting of an individual in New Zealand. Although little red flying foxes occur throughout Australia, they are particularly abundant in northern Australia. (Daniel, 1975; Hall, 1987; Vardon et al., 1997; Waithman, 1979)
Biogeographic Regions:
australian
(native
); oceanic islands
(native
).
Habitat
Little red flying foxes occur throughout coastal regions as well as arid landscapes of inland Australia. Limited knowledge from recent studies suggests that these bats often congregate at camps in riparian habitat, such as fresh/saltwater mangroves, bamboo, and closed forests. Selection of such congregation sites may be determined by seasonal variation, as well as by other factors; such as human hunting, natural catastrophe regimes, and climatic fluctuations. (Sinclair, Webb, and Tideman, 1996; Tidemann et al., 1999; Webb and Tidemann, 1999)
These animals are found in the following types of habitat:
temperate
; tropical
; terrestrial
.
Terrestrial Biomes:
forest
.
Wetlands: swamp
.
Other:
agricultural
; riparian
.
Physical Description
(0.04 to 0.05 in; avg. 0.04 in)
Little red flying foxes are medium-sized bats. The average wingspan of P. scapulatus males varies from .9 to 1.2 m. Weights of these males can can reach 550 g. There is no relevant literature available pertaining to body length and basal metabolic rate of P. scapulatus. However the body length of black flying foxes (Pteropus alecto) is known to range from 240 to 260 mm.
After winter solstice, the testicular size and body weight of males increase. (McGuckin and Blackshaw, 1991; O’Brien, 1993; Sinclair, Webb, and Tideman, 1996)
Some key physical features:
endothermic
; bilateral symmetry
.
Sexual dimorphism:
male larger.
Reproduction
These bats breed once yearly.
Breeding occurs in November and December.
Females and males congregate in large camps, especially during the 2-month mating season and during the 5 months of lactation. As many as 1 million individuals are known to congregate at a single camp.
Studies suggest that most females are associated with males in harem groups during the mating season. After mating, females establish small groups consisting exclusively of females. These small female groups are maintained until young are born. (Nelson, 1965; Nowak, 1999)
Mating systems:
polygynous
.
The breeding season of P. scapulatus occurs between the Australian spring months of November and December. It and appears to be regulated by circannual endogenous rhythms. Young are born 5 months later in April to May. Many species in the genus Pteropus undergo delayed implantation, so it is possible that the actual time of development is not as long as the gestation period indicates. Lactation in this genus lasts between 3 and 6 months, although data are not available on its duration for P. scapulatus. Sexual maturity is typically reached between 18 months and 2 years of age. (Nowak, 1999; O’Brien and Nankervis, 1994; O’Brien, 1993; O’Brien, 1996)
Key reproductive features:
iteroparous
; seasonal breeding
; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual
; fertilization
; delayed implantation
.
Young bats are not able to fly from birth, and so may be called altricial. In some Pteropus species, the mother carries her young with her for a few months. There are no data on this behavior P. scapulatus. Lactating Pteropus females raise their young close to adult size before they are weaned. Females must contribute close to all of the calcium that is required to the developing skeletal system of the offspring. As a consequence, females often suffer from osteoporosis. Females with osteoporosis have a greater chance of breaking bones necessary for flight. Without the ability to fly, there is a high probability that females with broken limbs will die from starvation.
There are no data available on the role of males in parental care. (Nelson, 2001)
Parental investment:
altricial
; pre-fertilization (provisioning, protecting: female); pre-hatching/birth (provisioning: female, protecting: female); pre-weaning/fledging (provisioning: female, protecting: female).
Lifespan/Longevity
No information is available on the life span of this species. However, other members of the genus are reported to have lived as long as 30 years in captivity. As flying mammals typically have lifespans longer than expected based solely upon their body size, it is likely that P. scapulatus has a similarly long lifespan. (Nowak, 1999)
Behavior
The distribution of little red flying foxes extends throughout an area of 3.5 million km2. This range includes both temperate and tropical regions. During the warmer months of October to April, P. scapulatus primarily inhabits the temperate regions at the southern extent of its range. (Radcliff, 1931; Sinclair, Webb, and Tideman, 1996)
Home Range
No information is available pertaining to the home range of this species.
Communication and Perception
Species within Pteropus are frugivores and do not echolocate. No information on the communication of P. scapulatus is available; however, generally Pteropus species are known to communicate with loud vocalizations. While roosting, vocalizations are emitted by adults and juveniles at frequencies that are audible to the human ear. Communication by such vocalizations occurs during agonistic behaviors, escaping agonistic behaviors, and by females when males attempt to copulate with them. Vocalizations by juveniles help mothers identify their young after foraging.
In addition to vocal communication, tactile communication is important between mates and between mothers and their offspring.
Chemical communication is important in some species of Pteropus, especially in helping males mark territories during breeding season. Although this behavior has not been reported for this species, it is possible that similar scent cues are used.
The role of visual signals, such as body postures, has not been investigated. (Nowak, 1999)
Food Habits
Little red flying foxes are known to primarily feed on blossoms of eucalyptus trees. However, it is currently uncertain what the importance of eucalyptus foliage is in their diet. It has been suggested that Pteropus species obtain high amounts of calcium from calcium-rich vegetation such as eucalyptus. There is some suggestion that P. scapulatus follows the foraging resources of eucalyptus blooms throughout the landscape. No other information pertaining to the foraging habits of little red flying foxes is currently available. (Barclay, 2002; Funakoshi, Watanabe, and Kunisaki, 1993; Marshall, 1985; Nelson, 1965; Radcliff, 1931; Richards, 1995; Sinclair, Webb, and Tideman, 1996; Vardon et al., 1997)
Plant Foods:
fruit; nectar; flowers.
Predation
Limited information is available on the predators of Pteropus species. In many states throughout Australia, P. scapulatus is considered a pest, and is subject to large-scale hunting and poisoning by humans. (Nowak, 1999)
Ecosystem Roles
Little red flying foxes are important for the pollination and seed dispersal of native flora within Australia. (Nowak, 1999)
Key ways these animals impact their ecosystem:
disperses seeds; pollinates.
Economic Importance for Humans: Negative
In regions of fruit production, this species is considered a pest because of its tendency to feed upon agricultural crops. (Nowak, 1999)
Ways that these animals might be a problem for humans:
crop pest.
Economic Importance for Humans: Positive
Pteropus scapulatus contributes to the pollination of plants that are important for humans, including trees used for lumber, food, and medicine. (Nowak, 1999)
Ways that people benefit from these animals:
pollinates crops.
Conservation Status
IUCN Red List: [link]:
Lower Risk - Least Concern.
US Federal List: [link]:
No special status.
CITES: [link]:
No special status.
Pteropus scapulatus is considered common, and is legally protected in Australia. This species does not qualify for endangered, threatened, or vulnerable status and is considered a taxon of least concern. (Nowak, 1999; Sinclair, Webb, and Tideman, 1996)
Contributors
Jeremie Marko (author), Humboldt State University. Brian Arbogast (editor, instructor), Humboldt State University.
Nancy Shefferly (editor), Animal Diversity Web Staff.
