Animal Diversity Web U of M Museum of Zoology ADW Home ADW Home ADW Home University of Michigan Help About Aninal Names Teaching Special Topics About Us




Structured Inquiry Search — preview

Home -> Kingdom Animalia -> Phylum Chordata -> Subphylum Vertebrata -> Class Mammalia -> Order Rodentia -> Suborder Myomorpha -> Family Cricetidae -> Subfamily Neotominae -> Species Peromyscus keeni

Peromyscus keeni
northwestern deermouse



2010/02/07 04:22:16.036 US/Eastern

By Kimberly Dullen

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Rodentia
Suborder: Myomorpha
Family: Cricetidae
Subfamily: Neotominae
Genus: Peromyscus
Species: Peromyscus keeni

Geographic Range

Peromyscus keeni is found in western British Columbia, western Washington, and southeastern Alaska, including the Haida Gwaii (Queen Charlotte) islands, the Alexander Archipelago, and other coastal islands. (Linzey and Hammerson, 2008; Musser and Carleton, 2005)

Biogeographic Regions:
nearctic (native ).

Habitat

Northwestern deer mice are adapted to many habitats, but appear to thrive in upland and new-growth forests. They also commonly inhabit old-growth forests and floodplains, although those are less favorable because they lack the spatial and temporal complexity that promotes survivorship. They are found in rainy areas with mild climates and semi-open canopies. They are found at higher elevations than Peromyscus maniculatus in the same region. On small islands, northwestern deer mice are found along the edges of cedar-spruce forest and on beaches where logs, rocks, and debris provide sufficient cover. (Linzey and Hammerson, 2008; Lomolin and Perault, 2007; Smith and Nichols, 2004; Van Zant and Wooten, 2007)

These animals are found in the following types of habitat:
temperate ; terrestrial .

Terrestrial Biomes:
forest ; rainforest .

Aquatic Biomes:
coastal .

Other:
riparian .

Physical Description

Mass
10 to 30 g
(0.35 to 1.06 oz)


Length
181 to 236 mm
(7.13 to 9.29 in)


Northwestern deer mice are medium sized cricetids. Juveniles are a grayish color, while adults are tri-colored. They are brown dorsally and light grey ventrally with tails that are brown dorsally and white ventrally. Northwestern deer mice have long tails (more than 100 mm) and large, naked ears. The tail is slender with short hair and is distinctly bi-colored. Peromyscus keeni is distinguishable from P. maniculatus because of its darker fur color and longer tail (tail length in P. maniculatus is less than 100 mm). Body size in northwestern deer mice is significantly correlated with elevation, with body size peaking at intermediate elevations. (Lomolin and Perault, 2007; Musser and Carleton, 2005)

Some key physical features:
endothermic ; homoiothermic; bilateral symmetry .

Reproduction

Breeding interval
Female northwestern deer mice breed two to three times per breeding season.

Breeding season
Breeding occurs from February to October.

Number of offspring
2 to 5; avg. 4.30

Gestation period
23 to 25 days

Time to weaning
3 to 4 weeks

Time to independence
3 to 4 weeks

Age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
5 to 6 weeks

Age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)
5 to 6 weeks

There is no available information on mating systems in northwestern deer mice. Mating systems in Peromyscus are variable, and include monogamous, roving, or polygynous mating behaviors. At high female densities, males become more territorial and defend a small number of females or maintain a monogamous relationship with one female. In areas with low female densities, females become solitary and males develop a less territorial, roving strategy where they mate with multiple females. Females generally maintain small, solitary home areas in all mating systems. (Linzey and Hammerson, 2008; Nichol et al., 1993; Ribble, 2003)

During the breeding season, northwestern deer mice females with mates have short breeding intervals and exhibit postpartum estrus. Breeding intervals are increased among females that do not have established mates. In wild populations, many adults only live long enough to reproduce during one breeding season. Adult males enter breeding condition prior to adult females and all females average 2 to 3 litters per breeding season. Females give birth to 2 to 5 young after a gestation period of 23 to 25 days. Gestation periods are shorting when females are nursing a previous litter. Litter size is positively correlated with relative litter mass: larger litter sizes result in smaller body sizes of young in that litter. Young are weaned and independent at 3 to 4 weeks old and may be able to breed as early as 5 to 6 weeks old. Males have a lifetime reproductive success that is twice that of females. (Kenagy and Barnes, 1988; Linzey and Hammerson, 2008; Morrison, Dieterich, and Preston, 1976; Ribble, 2003)

Key reproductive features:
iteroparous ; seasonal breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; viviparous ; post-partum estrous.

Parental investment in northwestern deer mice has not been well-studied. Like all mammals, females invest substantially in young through gestation and lactation. (Botten, Ricci, and Hyelle, 2001; Ribble, 2003)

Parental investment:
altricial ; pre-fertilization (provisioning, protecting: female); pre-hatching/birth (provisioning: female, protecting: female); pre-weaning/fledging (provisioning: female, protecting: female).

Lifespan/Longevity

Extreme lifespan (wild)
3 years (high)

Average lifespan (wild)
1 years

Little research has been conducted on the lifespan of northwestern deer mice. Related species (P. maniculatus, P. californicus, and P. leucopus) have expected lifespans in the wild of 342.2 days for males and 280.9 days for breeding females. Some individuals survive to reproduce for a second breeding season. (Botten, Ricci, and Hyelle, 2001; Podlutsky et al., 2008; Ribble, 2003)

Behavior

Territory Size
2678 m^2 (average)

Northwestern deer mice are nocturnal and have a more loosely structured social hierarchy than some of their sister taxa. A rapid growth rate, larger litter sizes, and simple nests contribute to their social structure difference. Males exhibit severe aggression when confronted by other males. Males show aggression towards other males in their territory, submission when in a new territory, and are more prone to initiate grooming when encountering new females. Females show no defensive behavior around their nest unless they are pregnant. In some instances females will share their nest with their younger, reproducing female offspring. (Eisenberg, 1962; Hanley and Barnard, 1999a; Ribble, 2003)

Home Range

Territoriality in northwestern deer mice is dependent on population density. In a heavily populated area males will have relatively small territories, while in a low density area they maintain larger territories. Females typically maintain smaller territories that overlap with the territories of several males. (Eisenberg, 1962; Hanley and Barnard, 1999a; Ribble, 2003)

Key behaviors:
terricolous; nocturnal ; motile ; sedentary ; solitary ; territorial ; social .

Communication and Perception

Rodents rely heavily on their sense of olfaction to interact within their social hierarchies. Dominance can be conveyed to other members of the community solely by odor. A recent topic of interest for research is rodent ultrasound. Ultrasonic vocalizations have been observed in research mice as well as in wild populations of P. californicus and P. boylii. Based on literature on other mammal and bird ultrasound, it is likely that this method of communication is used by all Peromyscus species to communicate with offspring, maintain territory boundaries, and to communicate with as well as attract mates. It is unlikely that ultrasonic vocalizations are used as a alarm calls as this behavior is only known from diurnal animals. (Kalcounis-Rueppell, Metheny, and Vonhof, 2006)

Communicates with:
acoustic ; chemical .

Perception channels:
visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; ultrasound ; chemical .

Food Habits

Northwestern deer mice are mainly granivorous ground foragers. In an intake preference study done on foods from southeastern Alaska seeds from trees, shrubs and fruits were compared as well as fruits for palatability. It was found that salmonberry, stink currants, devil's club seeds, and Sitka spruce seeds were preferred. When diet composition in different ecological habitats was compared, stomach contents did not vary significantly. All diets were composed mostly of fruits and seeds of understory plants, followed by tree seeds and leaf material, with small amounts of arthropods and traces of fungi. Tree seeds become a more important part of their diets during winter and early spring because these mice do not cache food or store seasonal fat. In some areas they eat the eggs of nesting birds, including marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) and rhinoceros auklets (Cerorhinca monocerata). (Blight, Ryder, and Bertram, 1999; Bradley and Marxluff, 2003; Drever et al., 2000; Hanley and Barnard, 1999b; Reese, Barnard, and Hanley, 1997)

Primary Diet:
herbivore (granivore ); omnivore .

Animal Foods:
birds; fish; eggs; carrion ; insects; terrestrial non-insect arthropods.

Plant Foods:
leaves; seeds, grains, and nuts; fruit.

Other Foods:
fungus.

Predation

Known predators

Primary predators are American martens (Martes americana), owls (Strigidae), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Other terrestrial predators are likely to take northwestern deer mice and their young, including large snakes, other raptors, and weasels (Mustela). Northwestern deer mice are cryptically colored and secretive to avoid predation. (Ben-David, Flynn, and Schell, 1996)

Anti-predator adaptations::
cryptic .

Ecosystem Roles

Northwestern deer mice influence seabird populations in coastal areas by preying on their eggs and nestlings. Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) and rhinoceros auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata) are preyed on by these mice. In one study area, 34% of rhinoceros auklet eggs had been preyed on by northwestern deer mice. Predation occurs mostly during the early post-laying period when adults are foraging and occurs minimally in later incubation and hatchling periods. If food sources for the rhinoceros auklets become limited their foraging time increases, which puts their eggs at an even greater risk for predation. (Blight, Ryder, and Bertram, 1999; Bradley and Marxluff, 2003; Drever et al., 2000)

Seed dispersal mutualism has been suggested between Peromyscus maniculatus and limber pine (Pinus flexilis). Other Peromyscus species may drive seed defense evolution through their secondary dispersal effects, causing the method of seed dispersal which plants rely on to change in the presence of ground scavengers. (Siepielski and Benkman, 2008)

Peromyscus keeni can be a host to several invertebrate parasites such as lice, ticks, bots and fleas. The flea species that are known to use P. keeni as a host are: Hystrichopsylla occidentalis, Catallagia charlottensis, Ceratophyllus ciliates protinus, Megabothris abantis, Opisodasys keeni, and Malaraeus telchinus. (Haas et al., 2005)

Key ways these animals impact their ecosystem:
disperses seeds.

Commensal or parasitic species (or larger taxonomic groups) that use this species as a host
  • fleas (Opisodasys keeni)
  • fleas (Hystrichopsylla occidentalis)
  • fleas (Catallagia charlottensis)
  • fleas (Ceratophyllus ciliates protinus)
  • fleas (Megabothris abantis)
  • fleas (Malaraeus telchinus)
  • ticks (Ixodidae)
  • bot flies (Oestridae)

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

Peromyscus maniculatus is a natural reservoir for Lyme disease and hantavirus. Peromyscus keeni may also transmit these pathogens and negatively affect human health. Northwestern deer mice may also enter homes and become a nuisance. (Nichol et al., 1993; Stafford et al., 1999)

Ways that these animals might be a problem for humans:
injures humans (carries human disease); household pest.

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

Species in the genus Peromyscus are useful for the research of genomic imprinting. Peromyscus has been an important model for showing an X-linked locus in hybrid dysgenesis when crossing different species. They have also been used for researching reproductive isolation in mammals. Peromyscus have a much longer lifespan than typical lab mice, making them useful for many forms of research. The longevity of Peromyscus has been analyzed as baseline research for comparative aging research. Their physiological characteristics may help us understand and treat age-related diseases such as cancer. (Podlutsky et al., 2008; Vrana, 2007)

Ways that people benefit from these animals:
research and education.

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List: [link]:
Not Evaluated.

US Federal List: [link]:
No special status.

CITES: [link]:
No special status.

State of Michigan List: [link]:
No special status.

Peromyscus keeni is listed as “least concern” by the IUCN because of their widespread, stable populations and adaptability to various habitats. (Linzey and Hammerson, 2008; Smith and Nichols, 2004)

Other Comments

Peromyscus keeni includes the previously recognized species Peromyscus keeni oreas and Peromyscus keeni sitkensis as well as some populations previously recognized as Peromyscus maniculatus (P. m. algidus, P. m. hylaeus, P. m. keeni, P. m. macrorhinus, and P. m. prevostensis). It is possible that 3 other P. maniculatus subspecies should be included in P. keeni: P. m. carli, P. m. doylei, and P. m. triangularis. (Linzey and Hammerson, 2008; Musser and Carleton, 2005)

A health condition of the genus Peromyscus that is prevalent at a similar rate in humans is periodontal disease. Peromyscus keeni exhibited this disease at rates between 7 and 13.5%, with a significantly increased rate in populations on isolated islands. This condition occurs rarely in any other mammalian species, which may make Peromyscus a valuable research model. (Wiebe et al., 2001)

For More Information

Find Peromyscus keeni information at

Contributors

Tanya Dewey (editor), Animal Diversity Web, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.

Kimberly Dullen (author), University of Alaska Fairbanks. Hayley Lanier (editor, instructor), University of Alaska Fairbanks.

References

Ben-David, M., R. Flynn, D. Schell. 1996. Seasonal Diets of Mink and Martens. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Blight, L., J. Ryder, D. Bertram. 1999. Predation on rhinoceros auklet eggs by a native population of Peromyscus. The Condor, 101: 871-876.

Botten, J., R. Ricci, B. Hyelle. 2001. Establishment of a deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus rufinus) breeding colony from wild-caught founders: comparison of reproductive performance of wild-caught and laboratory-reared pairs. Comparative Medicine, 51/4: 314-318.

Bradley, J., J. Marxluff. 2003. Rodents as nest predators: influences on predatory behavior and consequences to nesting birds. Auk, 120/4: 1180-1187.

Drever, M., L. Blight, K. Hobson, D. Bertram. 2000. Predation on seabird eggs by keen's mice (Peromyscus keeni): using stable isotopes to decipher the diet of a terrestrial omnivore on a remote offshore island. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78/11: 2010-2018.

Eisenberg, J. 1962. Studies on the behavior of Peromyscus maniculatus gambelli and Peromyscus californicus parasiticus. Behaviour, 19/3: 177-207.

Haas, G., J. Kucera, A. Runck, S. MacDonald, J. Cook. 2005. Mammal fleas (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae) new for Alaska and the southeastern mainland collected during seven years of a field survey of small mammals. Journal of Entomology, 102: 65-76.

Hanley, T., J. Barnard. 1999. Spatial variation in population dynamics of Sitka mice in floodplain forests. Journal of Mammology, 80: 866-879.

Hanley, T., J. Barnard. 1999. Food resources and diet composition in riparian and upland habitats for Sitka mice, Peromyscus keeni sitkensis. Canadian Field Naturalist, 113: 401-407.

Kalcounis-Rueppell, M., J. Metheny, M. Vonhof. 2006. Production of ultrasonic vocalizations by Peromyscus mice in the wild. Frontiers in Zoology, 3/3: 1-12. Accessed November 14, 2008 at http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/3/1/3.

Kenagy, G., B. Barnes. 1988. Seasonal reproductive patterns in four coexisting rodent species from the Cascade Mountains, Washington. Journal of Mammalolgy, 69/2: 274-292.

Linzey, A., G. Hammerson. 2008. "Peromyscus keeni" (On-line). 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Accessed March 24, 2009 at http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/135164.

Lomolin, M., D. Perault. 2007. Body size variation of mammals in a fragmented, temperate rainforest. Conservation Biology, 21/4: 1059-1069.

MacDonald, S. 2003. The Small Mammals of Alaska a Field Handbook of the Shrews and Small Rodents. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Museum.

Morrison, P., R. Dieterich, D. Preston. 1976. Breeding and reproduction of fifteen wild rodents maintained as laboratory colonies. Laboratory Animal Science, 26/2: 237-243.

Musser, G., M. Carleton. 2005. Species Peromyscus keeni. Pp. 1069-1070 in D. E. . Wilson, D. M. Reeder, eds. Mammal Species of the World, Vol. 2, 3rd Edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Nichol, S., C. Spiropoulou, S. Morzunov, P. Rollin, T. Ksiazek, H. Feldmann, A. Sanchez, J. Childs, S. Zaki, C. Peters. 1993. Genetic identification of a hantavirus associated with an outbreak of acute respiratory illness. Science, 262/5135: 914-917.

Ungvari, Z., B. Krasnikov, A. Csiszar, N. Labinskyy, P. Mukhopadhyay, P. Pacher, A. Cooper, N. Podlutskaya, S. Austad, A. Podlutsky. 2008. Testing hypothesis of aging in long-lived mice of the genus Peromyscus: association between longevity and mitochondrial stress resistance, ROS detoxification pathways, and DNA repair efficiency. AGE, 30: 121-133. Accessed November 11, 2008 at http://www.springerlink.com/content/924r017851534251/fulltext.pdf.

Reese, E., J. Barnard, T. Hanley. 1997. Food preference and ad libitum intake of wild-captured Sitka mice, Peromyscus keeni sitkensis. Canadian Field Naturalist, 111: 223-226.

Ribble, D. 2003. Monogamy. Cambridge: United Kingdom: University Press.

Siepielski, A., C. Benkman. 2008. A seed predator drives the evolution of a seed dispersal mutualism. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 275: 1917-1925. Accessed November 05, 2008 at http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/275/1645/1917.full?sid=fe4bb258-6f28-480b-8244-83f4a4188e17.

Smith, W., J. Nichols. 2004. Demography of two endemic forest-floor mammals of southeastern Alaska temperate rain forest. Journal of Mammology, 85/3: 540-551.

Stafford, K., R. Massung, L. Magnarelli, J. Ijdo, J. Anderson. 1999. Infection with agents of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, lyme disease, and babesiosis in wild white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in Connecticut. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 37: 2887-2892.

Van Zant, J., M. Wooten. 2007. Old mice, young islands and competing biogeographical hypothesis. Molecular Ecology, 16/23: 5070-5083.

Vrana, P. 2007. Genomic imprinting as a mechanism of reproductive isolation in mammals. Journal of Mammology, 88/1: 5-23.

Wiebe, D., C. Adkins, E. Putnins, L. Hakkinen, H. Larjava. 2001. Naturally Occurring Periodontal Bone Loss in the Wild Deer Mouse, Genus Peromyscus. Journal of Periodontology, 72/5: 620-625.

2010/02/07 04:22:20.047 US/Eastern

To cite this page: Dullen, K. and H. Lanier. 2009. "Peromyscus keeni" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed February 09, 2010 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Peromyscus_keeni.html.

Disclaimer: The Animal Diversity Web is an educational resource written largely by and for college students. ADW doesn't cover all species in the world, nor does it include all the latest scientific information about organisms we describe. Though we edit our accounts for accuracy, we cannot guarantee all information in those accounts. While ADW staff and contributors provide references to books and websites that we believe are reputable, we cannot necessarily endorse the contents of references beyond our control.

Other formats: OWL

Home  ¦  About Us  ¦  Special Topics  ¦  Teaching  ¦  About Animal Names  ¦  Help

Structured Inquiry Search — preview