Animal Diversity Web U of M Museum of Zoology ADW Home ADW Home ADW Home University of Michigan Help About Aninal Names Teaching Special Topics About Us




Structured Inquiry Search — preview

Home -> Kingdom Animalia -> Phylum Chordata -> Subphylum Vertebrata -> Class Mammalia -> Order Rodentia -> Suborder Castorimorpha -> Family Heteromyidae -> Subfamily Perognathinae -> Species Perognathus amplus

Perognathus amplus
Arizona pocket mouse



2009/11/29 04:18:32.440 US/Eastern

By Jennifer Pfau

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Rodentia
Suborder: Castorimorpha
Family: Heteromyidae
Subfamily: Perognathinae
Genus: Perognathus
Species: Perognathus amplus

Geographic Range

Perognathus amplus is found throughout much of Arizona and into northern Mexico. Perognathus amplus can be divided into four subspecies, each with a slightly different distribution. Perognathus amplus amplus is distributed in central to south-western Arizona and in northwestern Sonora, Mexico. Perognathus amplus cineris is distributed in central northern Arizona. Perognathus amplus pergracilis is distributed in northwestern Arizona. Finally, Perognathus amplus taylori is distributed in central southern Arizona and northwestern Sonora, Mexico. (Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

Biogeographic Regions:
nearctic (native ).

Habitat

Elevation
1190 to 1653 m
(3903.2 to 5421.84 ft)


Arizona pocket mice are found in flat habitats with varying desertscrub vegetation or bunch-grasses, depending on the location in Arizona. The vegetation is most often mesquite bush, creosote bush, cactus, and palo verde, but it also includes greasewood, rabbitbrush, ephedra, shortgrass, fescue, and juniper. Within this habitat, Arizona pocket mice prefer the bush microhabitat, as opposed to the open microhabitat. Throughout their distribution, Arizona pocket mice are found where there are solid, stable, fine-textured soils. These soils are desirable for digging underground burrows, which is where they sleep, cache food, raise young, and periodically go torpid during the winter. Burrows can be detected by small openings and sand mounds, most often under a plant. (Brown et al., 1988; Hoffmeister, 1986; Price, Waser, and Bass, 1984; Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

These animals are found in the following types of habitat:
temperate ; terrestrial .

Terrestrial Biomes:
desert or dune .

Physical Description

Mass
9.40 to 14 g
(0.33 to 0.49 oz)


Length
61 to 85 mm
(2.4 to 3.35 in)


Arizona pocket mice get their name from their cheek pouches. The pouches are external pockets of skin which are lined with fur and have an opening next to the mouth (Brown and Burton, 1969). The pockets are most often used to transport food but can also be used to transport nesting materials. (Brown and Burton, 1969; Brown et al., 1988; Kotler et al., 1988)

Arizona pocket mice are quadrupedal. There are no differences in appearance between males and females of Perognathus amplus. Body length ranges from 61 to 85 mm. Tail length ranges from 72 to 95 mm, hind foot length from 17 to 22 mm, and body weight from 9.2 to 14 grams. Weight and length measurements are fairly invariable for Perognathus amplus throughout its distribution. (Hoffmeister, 1986; Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

The dorsal pelage of Arizona pocket mice is generally orange-ish tan with differing amounts of black dusting, depending on the location. For example, the dorsum is nearly black for mice living in black volcanic soils. The underside of Perognathus amplus is usually white or light tan. The tail is longer than the body, and darker in color on the top. This longer tail distinguishes Arizona pocket mice from silky pocket mice and Great Basin pocket mice. Perognathus amplus can be distinguished from little pocket mice, which are smaller and have a shorter tail; however, these differences tend to be subtle. (Hoffmeister, 1986; Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

Some key physical features:
endothermic ; bilateral symmetry .

Reproduction

Breeding interval
Arizona pocket mice breed once per year

Breeding season
Mating occurs from late February to early March

Number of offspring
1 to 7; avg. 4

Gestation period
3 to 4 weeks

When male Arizona pocket mice emerge from their burrows in late February, they give off a distinguishing scent similar to “stale movie-theater popcorn,” which is believed to be a chemical signal of ability to reproduce (Wilson and Ruff, 1999). (Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

Arizona pocket mice exhibit a single reproductive season beginning in late February to early March. The males come out of their burrows before the females do in expectation of mating. Female Arizona pocket mice become pregnant throughout April. The females nest in their burrow for 3 to 4 weeks while gestation occurs, after which litters ranging in size from 1 to 7 offspring are born (3 to 5 on average.) Weaning has presumably occurred by the time juveniles emerge from the burrows in May and June. Populations are at the maximum density in late summer. (Brown and Burton, 1969; enature.com and Inc, 2003; Hoffmeister, 1986; Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

Key reproductive features:
seasonal breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; viviparous .

There is no available information on the parental investment of Arizona pocket mice. This is likely because the young are reared in burrows.

Lifespan/Longevity

Extreme lifespan (captivity)
10 years (high)

There is no information about the life expectancy of Arizona pocket mice in the wild. Pocket mice in general have a short life expectancy. In contrast, Arizona pocket mice have been found to life up to ten years in captivity. (Brown and Burton, 1969; Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

Behavior

As is characteristic of heteromyid rodents, Arizona pocket mice are solitary. They spend their days in underground burrows, protected from the hot, dry air. They are mostly nocturnal and arise from their burrows at night to forage for food. Evidence has also shown that Arizona pocket mice decrease their activity in the presence of moonlight. When the temperature drops in fall, Arizona pocket mice stay in their burrows and lower their body temperature. This torpor allows them to preserve energy by lowering their metabolic rate. They do, however, arise occasionally to eat cached seeds. Arizona pocket mice remain in their burrows until the weather warms again in spring. (Brown and Burton, 1969; Costello and Rosenberger, 2003; enature.com and Inc, 2003; Kotler et al., 1988; Price, Waser, and Bass, 1984; Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

Home Range

There was no information available on the home range of Perognathus amplus. This is likely difficult to determine since Arizona pocket mice spend much of their time in underground burrows.

Key behaviors:
fossorial ; nocturnal ; motile ; hibernation ; solitary .

Communication and Perception

Perognathus amplus is a solitary mammal, so communication with other members of the species is minimal. Male Arizona pocket mice do, however, emit a scent during the mating season, which is believed to show they are capable of reproducing. Arizona pocket mice have vibrissae around their noses, which probably allow them to better perceive their environment while foraging for food at night. The auditory bullae of Arizona pocket mice are relatively small compared to those of other desert rodents such as kangaroo rats and mice, and thus their hearing is less acute. Arizona pocket mice also use vision and smell, although little is known about the acuity of these perception channels. (Brown et al., 1988; Kotler et al., 1988; Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

Communicates with:
visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical .

Other communication keywords:
pheromones .

Perception channels:
visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical .

Food Habits

Arizona pocket mice are primarily granivorous, eating seeds of forbs or woody plants; these include those of creosote bush, Pectocarya, heronbill, and plantain. They also occasionally eat insects and green vegetation. In captivity, they have been found to eat lettuce, mealworms, and millet seeds. Like all pocket mice, Arizona pocket mice do not drink. Their bodies have adapted to retain the necessary amounts of water from the food they eat. (Brown and Burton, 1969; Costello and Rosenberger, 2003; enature.com and Inc, 2003; Reichman, 1975; Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

Arizona pocket mice forage for seeds preferentially in the small, open spaces between shrubs, where they can remain hidden. This is believed to be because their quadrupedal morphology and less acute hearing puts them at a greater risk in open areas than other desert rodents such as kangaroo rats (Brown, et. al., 1988). Studies have shown that Arizona pocket mice also alter their foraging habits in response to risk of predators. In particular, they seem to avoid foraging in the open when barn owls are present and when there is moonlight, which makes them more visible to predators (Brown, et. al., 1988). Arizona pocket mice gather seeds either directly from plants or from beneath the soil. When harvesting from the soil, they apparently dig randomly to find the seeds and then sift sand and dirt through their front claws. Arizona pocket mice carry seeds to their burrows by packing them into their cheek pouches. They store the seeds in a storage area in their burrow, which they defend aggressively. Evidence from mice in captivity shows that Arizona pocket mice move seeds around in their burrows. This probably helps to keep the seeds moist since not all parts of the burrow are equally wet. (Brown and Burton, 1969; Brown et al., 1988; enature.com and Inc, 2003; Kotler et al., 1988; Price, Waser, and Bass, 1984; Reichman, 1975; Rosenzweig and Sterner, 1970; Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

Primary Diet:
herbivore (granivore ).

Animal Foods:
insects.

Plant Foods:
leaves; seeds, grains, and nuts.

Foraging Behaviors:
stores or caches food .

Predation

Known predators

Like other desert rodents, Arizona pocket mice are preyed upon by western diamondback rattlesnakes, mojave rattlesnakes, burrowing owls, barn owls, red-tailed hawks, and marsh hawks. (Brown, 1989; Kotler et al., 1988)

Anti-predator adaptations::
cryptic .

Ecosystem Roles

The deserts of Arizona are home to many granivorous rodent species. In a sense, Arizona pocket mice compete for food with other granivorous desert rodents. However, community organization allows for coexistence of these species with minimal competition for food and resources. For example, a study by Brown (1989) showed that Arizona pocket mice, Merriam’s kangaroo rats, Harris’s antelope ground squirrels, and round-tailed ground squirrels are each best-suited to forage for seeds at a different time of the year; the best time for Arizona pocket mice is from August to October. Studies have also shown that differences exist among the species in terms of microhabitat adaptations. The small size of Arizona pocket mice makes them suitable for the bushmicrohabitat, whereas the larger size, quadrupedal locomotion, and acute hearing of Merriam’s kangaroo rats make it more suitable for the open microhabitat (Brown, 1988). Additionally, kangaroo rats concentrate on high-density seed patches, while Arizona pocket mice prefer low-density patches (Reichman, 1979.). This also helps to reduce competition. (Brown et al., 1988; Brown, 1989; Reichman, 1979)

Arizona pocket mice alter their environment by disturbing the natural dispersal of seeds. In this way, they are capable of affecting the organization of the plant community. For example, in eating the seeds of their preferred food and preventing them from germinating, they may cause populations of less desirable food sources to flourish. They also they may reduce the competition between seedlings. Evidence also shows Arizona pocket mice aid in the germination of seeds they cache and do not eat. In addition to their impact on seed populations, Arizona pocket mice also change their ecosystem by digging underground burrow systems. (Hoffmeister, 1986; Reichman, 1979; Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

Key ways these animals impact their ecosystem:
disperses seeds; creates habitat.

Species (or larger taxonomic groups) used as hosts by this species
  • none known
Species (or larger taxonomic groups) that are mutualists with this species
  • none known
Commensal or parasitic species (or larger taxonomic groups) that use this species as a host
  • none known

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

There is no available information on the negative economic impacts of Arizona pocket mice on humans.

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

No information is available on the positive economic impacts of Arizona pocket mice on humans.

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List: [link]:
Lower Risk - Near Threatened.

US Federal List: [link]:
No special status.

CITES: [link]:
No special status.

The IUCN Red List places Perognathus amplus in the lower risk category. Within the lower risk category, Perognathus amplus is in the near threatened category, meaning it is close to being labeled as vulnerable. None of the subspecies of Perognathus amplus have special conservation status. There is no available information about what, if anything, is being done to help Perognathus amplus recover.

Other Comments

Studies of Perognathus amplus have shown significant yearly fluctuations in population sizes. The population size seems to depend on the amount of rainfall in the previous year, which likely affects the number of seeds plants produce. This suggests that Arizona pocket mice populations are limited by food; this could be because reproductive capabilities are limited by food, or because the chance of surviving is dependent on food, or a combination of the two (Wilson and Ruff, 1999). (Wilson and Ruff, 1999)

For More Information

Find Perognathus amplus information at

Contributors

Matthew Wund (editor), University of Michigan.

Jennifer Pfau (author), University of Michigan. Phil Myers (editor, instructor), Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan.

References

Brown, D., R. Burton. 1969. Pocket Mouse. Pp. 1000 in The International Wildlife Encyclopedia, Vol. 13, 1 Edition. New York: Marshall Cavendish Corp..

Brown, J., B. Kotler, R. Smith, W. Wirtz II. 1988. The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia, 76/3: 408-415.

Brown, J. 1989. Mechanisms underlying the organization of a desert rodent community. Journal of Arid Environments, 17/2: 211-218.

Costello, R., A. Rosenberger. 2003. "Perognathus amplus" (On-line). North American Mammals. Accessed March 20, 2004 at http://web4.si.edu/mna/image_info.cfm?species_id=252.

enature.com, Inc. 2003. ""Arizona Pocket Mouse"" (On-line). enature.com. Accessed March 24, 2004 at http://www.enature.com/fieldguide/showSpeciesGS.asp?sort=1&curGroupID=99&display=1&area=99&searchText=Arizona+pocket+mouse&curPageNum=1&recnum=MA0378.

Hoffmeister, D. 1986. Mammals of Arizona. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press : Arizona Game and Fish Dept.

Kotler, B., J. Brown, R. Smith, W. Wirtz II. 1988. The effects of morphology and body size on rates of owl predation on desert rodents. Oikos, 53/2: 145-152.

Price, M. 1978. The Role of Microhabitat in Structuring Desert Rodent Communities. Ecology, 59-5: 910-921.

Price, M., N. Waser, T. Bass. 1984. Effects of Moonlight on Microhabitat Use by Desert Rodents. Journal of Mammology, 65/2: 353-356.

Reichman, O. 1975. Relation of Desert Rodent Diets to Available Resources. Journal of Mammology, 56/4: 731-735.

Reichman, O. 1979. Desert Granivore Foraging and Its Impact on Seed Densities and Distributions. Ecology, 60/6: 1085-1092.

Rosenzweig, M., P. Sterner. 1970. Population Ecology of Desert Rodent Communities: Body Size and Seed-Husking as Bases for Heteromyid Coexistence. Ecology, 51/2: 217-224.

Simons, L. 1991. Rodent Dynamics in Relation to Fire in the Sonoran Desert. Journal of Mammology, 72/3: 518-524.

Wilson, D., S. Ruff. 1999. The Smithsonian book of North American Mammals. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press in association with the American Society of Mammalogists.

2009/11/29 04:18:35.148 US/Eastern

To cite this page: Pfau, J. and P. Myers. 2004. "Perognathus amplus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed December 04, 2009 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perognathus_amplus.html.

Disclaimer: The Animal Diversity Web is an educational resource written largely by and for college students. ADW doesn't cover all species in the world, nor does it include all the latest scientific information about organisms we describe. Though we edit our accounts for accuracy, we cannot guarantee all information in those accounts. While ADW staff and contributors provide references to books and websites that we believe are reputable, we cannot necessarily endorse the contents of references beyond our control.

Other formats: OWL

Home  ¦  About Us  ¦  Special Topics  ¦  Teaching  ¦  About Animal Names  ¦  Help

Structured Inquiry Search — preview