Animal Diversity Web U of M Museum of Zoology ADW Home ADW Home ADW Home University of Michigan Help About Aninal Names Teaching Special Topics About Us




Structured Inquiry Search — preview

Home -> Kingdom Animalia -> Phylum Chordata -> Subphylum Vertebrata -> Class Mammalia -> Order Rodentia -> Suborder Myomorpha -> Family Muridae -> Subfamily Leimacomyinae

Subfamily Leimacomyinae
groove-toothed forest mice



2008/07/20 05:14:27.369 GMT-4

By Allison Poor

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Rodentia
Suborder: Myomorpha
Family: Muridae
Subfamily: Leimacomyinae
Members of this Subfamily

Diversity

There is just one genus and species in this Old World murid subfamily: the groove-toothed forest mouse (Leimacomys büttneri). Little information is available on this subfamily, as it is only known from two specimens that were collected in 1890. (Musser and Carleton, 2005; Nowak, 1999)

Geographic Range

The two specimens representing this group are from Togo, in western Africa. (Nowak, 1999)

Biogeographic Regions:
ethiopian (native ).

Habitat

The two known tylomyine specimens were found in tropical forest. (Nowak, 1999)

These animals are found in the following types of habitat:
tropical ; terrestrial .

Terrestrial Biomes:
forest .

Systematic and Taxonomic History

Thomas (1896) included Leimacomys in the subfamily Dendromurinae. Ellerman (1940) and Simpson (1945) placed the genus in the subfamily Murinae, but later authors returned it to Dendromurinae (Carleton and Musser 1984). However, as Musser and Carleton (2005) note, Leimacomys has little in common with dendromurines besides dental charactistics similar to those of Steatomys; specifically, the presence of an additional lingual cusp adjacent to the second row of cusps on the first upper molar and the first row of cusps on the second upper molar. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis based on dental characteristics resulted in placement of Leimacomys in a clade with gerbillines, not dendromurines (Denys et al. 1995). However, Leimacomys possess a suite of cranial traits unlike those of gerbils so this unique genus is currently regarded as warranting in its own subfamily in the family Muridae (Musser and Carleton 2005). Phylogenetic analyses based on molecular traits will no doubt be neccessary to clarify its relationships to other muroid groups. (Carleton and Musser, 1984; Denys et al., 1995; Ellerman, 1940; Musser and Carleton, 2005; Simpson, 1945; Thomas, 1896)

Synapomorphies
  • tail length about 1/3 head and body length
  • forefeet with four well-developed digits, hind feet with five well-developed digits
  • nearly straight claws
  • thick fur lacks guard hairs
  • robust cranium with long, wide rostrum
  • wide interorbital region
  • pronounced supraorbital ridges
  • broad, wedge-shaped postorbital region
  • weakly developed temporal ridges
  • square-shaped occiput
  • wide zygomatic plate with pronounced anterior spine
  • poorly developed masseteric knob
  • thick zygomatic arches not bowed outward
  • deep braincase projects over occipital condyles
  • dorsal surface of braincase formed from large parietals and squamosal
  • long, narrow incisive foramina extend to first molars
  • wide bony palate extends posterior to third molars
  • more than half of mesopterygoid fossa roofed over by pterygoids and bony palate
  • small auditory bullae
  • mandible has long coronoid process, high ramus, and deep notch between condyloid and angular processes
  • incisor alveolus does not not extend into condyloid process; terminates in prominent knob anterior to base of coronoid process
  • narrow, proodont upper incisors bear faint grooves on anterior surface
  • very narrow lower incisors
  • upper molar rows diverge anteriorly
  • upper molars with simple crests, most formed by coalesence of two cusps
  • second crest on first upper molar and first crest on second upper molar chevron-shaped and formed by coalescence of three cusps
  • anteroconid fused with first chevron-shaped crest
  • third molars reduced in size
  • no posterior cingula on lower molars or second and third upper molars

Physical Description

Groove-toothed forest mice measure about 118 mm long, and the tail adds an extra 37 mm. They are dark brown or gray-brown above and pale gray below. The ears are small and furry. There are four well-developed digits on the forefeet, and five on the hind feet. They have long claws, especially on the hind feet, and naked, scaly tails.

The leimacomyine dental formula is 1/1, 0/0, 0/0, 3/3 = 16. The proodont upper incisors bear shallow grooves, and the third molars are not reduced in size. The upper molar rows diverge anteriorly. Unlike dendromurines, the first crest of each first upper molar is not bicuspid. There is a small posterior cingulum on each first and second upper molar. The bony palate of leimacomyines extends posterior to the rear margins of the molar rows, and the incisive foramina are long and narrow. Groove-toothed forest mice have long, wide rostrums and a broad interorbital region with beaded edges. They have low temporal ridges and small auditory bullae. The zygomatic plates are relatively broad, and the anterior portion of each extends forward past the zygomatic arches in a conspicuous spine. The masseteric knob or tubercle is poorly developed. (Carleton and Musser, 1984; Nowak, 1999)

Some key physical features:
endothermic ; homoiothermic; bilateral symmetry .

Reproduction

The mating system of groove-toothed forest mice is unknown.

No information is available on the reproduction of leimacomyines.

Key reproductive features:
gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; fertilization (internal ); viviparous .

Besides the fact that they are mammals, and therefore females nurse their young, no information is available on the investment that groove-toothed forest mice make in their offspring.

Parental investment:
pre-fertilization (protecting: female); pre-hatching/birth (provisioning: female, protecting: female); pre-weaning/fledging (provisioning: female).

Lifespan/Longevity

The lifespan of leimacomyines is unknown.

Behavior

Nothing is known about the behavior of these rodents, except that they are probably terrestrial. (Carleton and Musser, 1984; Nowak, 1999)

Key behaviors:
motile .

Communication and Perception

Groove-toothed forest mice presumably sense visual, tactile, auditory, and chemical cues, as most mammals can, but the acuteness of these senses and the way in which they communicate with one another is unknown.

Perception channels:
visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical .

Food Habits

Groove-toothed forest mice are presumed to be at least partially insectivorous. (Nowak, 1999)

Primary Diet:
carnivore (insectivore ).

Predation

There are no reports of predation on leimacomyines.

Ecosystem Roles

If groove-toothed forest mice are indeed insectivorous, then they have a role as secondary consumers. They are most likely preyed upon by higher-level consumers as well.

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

There are no known negative effects of leimacomyines on humans.

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

There are no known positive effects of leimacomyines on humans.

Conservation

Because so little is known about it, including whether or not it still exists, Leimacomys is listed as data deficient by the IUCN. No surveys of the area where the two known specimens were found have been undertaken to date. (Van der Straeten and Schlitter, 2004)

Contributors

Allison Poor (author), University of Michigan.
Tanya Dewey (editor), Animal Diversity Web, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.

References

Carleton, M., G. Musser. 1984. Muroid rodents. Pp. 289-379 in S. Anderson, J. K. Jones Jr., eds. Orders and Families of Recent Mammals of the World. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Denys, C., J. Michaux, F. Catzeflis, S. Ducrocq, P. Chevret. 1995. Morphological and molecular data against the monophyly of Dendromurinae (Muridae: Rodentia). Bonner Zoologische Beitraege, 45(3-4): 173-190.

Ellerman, J. 1940. The Families and Genera of Living Rodents, vol. I. London: British Museum (Natural History).

Musser, G., M. Carleton. 2005. Superfamily Muroidea. D. E. Wilson, D. M. Reeder, eds. Mammal Species of the World. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Nowak, R. 1999. Walker's Mammals of the World, vol. II. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Simpson, G. 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 85: 1-350.

Thomas, O. 1896. On the genera of rodents: an attempt to bring up to date the current arrangement of the order. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: 1012-1028.

Van der Straeten, E., D. Schlitter. 2004. "Leimacomys buettneri" (On-line). 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Accessed June 24, 2005 at www.redlist.org.

2008/07/20 05:14:31.323 GMT-4

To cite this page: Poor, A. 2005. "Leimacomyinae" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed July 25, 2008 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Leimacomyinae.html.

Disclaimer: The Animal Diversity Web is an educational resource written largely by and for college students. ADW doesn't cover all species in the world, nor does it include all the latest scientific information about organisms we describe. Though we edit our accounts for accuracy, we cannot guarantee all information in those accounts. While ADW staff and contributors provide references to books and websites that we believe are reputable, we cannot necessarily endorse the contents of references beyond our control.

Other formats: OWL

Home  ¦  About Us  ¦  Special Topics  ¦  Teaching  ¦  About Animal Names  ¦  Help

Structured Inquiry Search — preview