Animal Diversity Web U of M Museum of Zoology ADW Home ADW Home ADW Home University of Michigan Help About Aninal Names Teaching Special Topics About Us




Structured Inquiry Search — preview

Home -> Kingdom Animalia -> Phylum Chordata -> Subphylum Vertebrata -> Class Mammalia -> Order Artiodactyla -> Family Bovidae -> Subfamily Caprinae -> Species Hemitragus jemlahicus

Hemitragus jemlahicus
Himalayan tahr



2008/05/11 04:39:56.636 GMT-4

By Sara Kennedy

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Family: Bovidae
Subfamily: Caprinae
Genus: Hemitragus
Species: Hemitragus jemlahicus

Geographic Range

Hemitragus jemlahicus is native to the southern flanks of the Himalaya Mountains from northern India east to Bhutan, as far north as Tibet. It has been widely introduced elsewhere for hunting. After introduction to New Zealand in 1904 it spread to all the suitable habitat there. There are also introducted populations in New Mexico, California, Ontario, and South Africa.

(Forsyth and Hickling 1998; Kingel; Tustin 1990; Williams 2001)

Habitat

Elevation
750 to 5000 m
(2460 to 16400 ft)


In the Himalayas, Hemitragus jemlahicus prefers rugged wooded hills and mountains slopes in the subalpine and alpine regions from 3500-4500 meters in elevation. It may also seasonally use mixed oak forests as low as 2500 meters and alpine meadows as high as 5000 meters.

In New Zealand H. jemlahicus lives on grassy mountain slopes, large rock bluff systems, snow tussok basins, and the uppermost subalpine scrubland from 750-2250 meters in elevation. It prefers north and north-east facing slopes, which are sunnier and have less snow accumulation in the winter.

(Klingel; Tustin 1990)

These animals are found in the following types of habitat:
temperate .

Terrestrial Biomes:
scrub forest ; mountains .

Physical Description

Mass
36 to 90 kg; avg. 63 kg
(79.2 to 198 lbs; avg. 138.6 lbs)


Length
90 to 140 cm; avg. 115 cm
(35.43 to 55.12 in; avg. 45.28 in)


Hemitragus jemlahicus has relatively short legs and a small head. Males are large than females. Males average 73 kg in weight while females average 36 kg. Their hooves are well-adapted for their mountain habitat, with a hard rim of keratin surrounding a soft spongy convex pad. These hooves and strong dewclaws allow them to be excellent climbers.

The adult male in winter has a dark face and muzzle, sides and hindquarters black to red-brown, a reddish rump patch, and a lighter underside. It has a thick ruff or mane around its neck and shoulders and down its front legs. Older males are darker, with a light band along the flanks and a dark mid-dorsal line. The mane may be as long as 250 cm and is slate grey to straw-colored. The adult female in winter is grey to brown with a darker muzzle and legs and a light underside. The summer coat in adults of both sexes is shorter and lighter brown to straw-colored. Young are uniformly brown except for the front of their legs, which are black.

Both sexes have horns which curve up, back, and then in. They are laterally flattened, triangular in cross-section, and have a keel on the front edge. Males have longer horns (up to 450 mm) than females (up to 190 mm).

(Forsyth 1998; Huffman; Tustin 1990)

Some key physical features:
endothermic ; bilateral symmetry .

Reproduction

Breeding season
births in April-July (spring-summer)

Number of offspring
1 to 2; avg. 1.01

Gestation period
6 months (low); avg. 6 months

Birth Mass
2000 g (average)
(70.4 oz)
[External Source: AnAge]


Age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
2 to 6 years; avg. 4 years

Age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)
2 to 6 years; avg. 4 years

In the Himalayas, the rut runs from mid-October to mid-January. In New Zealand, the rut runs from April to July and peaks in May or early June. The difference in breeding season is due the six-month shift in seasons between the northern and southern hemispheres. Captive animals that are transplated to the opposite hemisphere shift their breeding cycles in two years or less. During the rut, younger males will follow groups of females and attempt, generally unsuccessfully, to mate with any female. Older males will follow and defend individual oestrus females. The mating display consists of a male standing facing a female, at a right angle to her, with his head and muzzle high and his mane erect and hiding his horns. This is followed by a series of head nods and brief copulation. The competitive display involves two males walking stiffly parallel to each other, with their mane and dorsal ridge erect, their heads down, and their horns exposed. The victor will either move to block the path of his opponent or chase him away. Only rarely does the competitive display lead to direct head-to-head wrestling, which in Hemitragus jemlahicus has been described as "half-hearted" relative to other horned or antlered mammals.

(Forsyth 1998, Forsyth and Hickling 1998, Huffman; Pare, Barrette, and Prescott 1996, Tustin 1990)

Mating systems:
polygynous .

Females leave their groups to give birth. The kid is able to nurse within a few minutes and can walk within three hours. Mother and kid return to the group after a few days. Twins are very rare in the wild, but occur more frequently in captivity. In the Himalayas, births occur from mid-April to mid-July. In New Zealand, the median birth date is 30 November. Females are fecund at 2 years. Captive females can concieve at up to 18 years old, although they rarely live that long in the wild. Males are fecund at 2 years, but rarely have successful access to females until 4 years old.

(Forsyth 1998; Haysen, van Tienhoven, and van Tienhoven 1993; Pare, Barrette, and Prescott 1996; Tustin 1990)

Key reproductive features:
seasonal breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; fertilization (internal ); viviparous .

Young stay in their mothers group until two years old, when the males disperse to form male-only groups. Females do not disperse.

(Tustin 1990)

Parental investment:
altricial ; female parental care ; post-independence association with parents.

Lifespan/Longevity

Extreme lifespan (captivity)
22 years (high)

Average lifespan (wild)
10 years

Typical lifespan (wild)


Average lifespan (captivity)
21.80 years
[External Source: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research]


Normal lifespan is 10-14 years, although individuals up to 22 years old have been reported. Females live longer than males. Accidental death due to rock slides or avalanches is not uncommon.

(Huffman; Pare, Barrette, and Prescott 1996; Tustin 1990)

Behavior

Hemitragus jemlahicus is most active in the early morning and late afternoon, 3-4 hours post-dawn and pre-dusk. It spends over half the daylight hours resting. It has a daily vertical migration, moving upslope in the morning, resting there in the middle of the day, and moving downslope for the night.

H. jemlahicus lives in herds of 2-23 animals. Outside of the breeding season, males usually live in seperate groups from females and young (under 2 years old), with males older than four years often seperate from younger males. Groups that include males are larger than all-female groups. There is no apparent dominance hierachy within groups.

(Forsyth 1998; Forsyth and Hickling 1997; Huffman; Nowak 1995; Tustin 1990)

Key behaviors:
crepuscular ; motile ; migratory ; social .

Food Habits

Hemitragus jemlahicus has had a significant negative effect on the native flora of New Zealand, which has no native herbivores. During the winter it eats less due to poor food quality and high metabolic costs. It eats alpine herbs and subalpine scrubland plants.

(Forsyth 1998; Forsyth, Parkes, and Hickling 2000; Huffman; Tustin 1990)

Primary Diet:
herbivore (folivore ).

Plant Foods:
leaves.

Predation

Known predators

In the Himalayas, Hemitragus jemlahicus is preyed on by the snow leopard, Uncia uncia. In New Zealand and other areas it has been introduced, its only predator is humans.

(Huffman)

Ecosystem Roles

Hemitragus jemlahicus has had a significant negative affect on the native flora of New Zealand, which has no native herbivores.

(Forsyth 1998; Forsyth, Parkes, and Hickling 2000; Tustin 1990)

Key ways these animals impact their ecosystem:
biodegradation .

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

Hemitragus jemlahicus has had a significant negative affect on the native flora of New Zealand, which has no native herbivores.

(Forsyth 1998; Forsyth, Parkes, and Hickling 2000; Tustin 1990)

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

Hemitragus jemlahicus is widely hunted for sport and trophies. It is also hunted for meat.

(Davys, Forsyth, and Hickling 1998; Forsyth 1998)

Ways that people benefit from these animals:
food ; body parts are source of valuable material.

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List: [link]:
Vulnerable.

US Federal List: [link]:
No special status.

CITES: [link]:
No special status.

In its native habitat, Hemitragus jemlahicus now survives only as remnant populations due to hunting and habitat loss. In areas where it was introduded, it is doing well, but is often heavily managed.

(Forsyth, Parkes, and Hickling 2000; Tustin 1990)

Contributors

Sara Kennedy (author), University of Michigan.
Kate Teeter (editor), University of Michigan.

References

Huffman, B. "The Ultimate Ungulate PAge" (On-line). Accessed November 19, 2001 at http://www.ultimateungulate.com/tahrhim.html.

Klingel, J. "Biota Information System of New Mexico BISON" (On-line). Accessed November 19, 2001 at http://www.cnr.vt.edu/fishex/nmex_main/species/050818.htm.

Davys, T., D. Forsyth, G. Hichling. August 8, 1998. "The Royal Society of New Zealand: New Zealand Journal of Zoology Abstracts" (On-line). Accessed November 19, 2001 at http://www.rsnz.govt.nt/publish/nzjz/1999/1.php.

Forsyth, D., G. Hickling. 1997. An improved technique for indexing abundance of Himalayan thar. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 21(1): 97-101.

Forsyth, D., G. Hickling. 1998. Increasing Himalayan tahr and decreasing chamois densities in the eastern Southern Alps, New Zealand: evidence for interspecific competition. Oecologia, 113: 377-382.

Forsyth, D. 1998. Long-term harvesting and male migration in a New Zealand population of Himalayan tahr *Hemitragus jemlahicus*. Journal of Applied Ecology, 36 (3): 351-362.

Forsyth, D., J. Parkes, G. Hickling. 2000. A case for multi-species managemt of sympatric herbivore pest impacts in the central Southern Alps, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 24(1): 97-103.

Haysen, V., A. van Tienhoven, A. van Tienhoven. 1993. Asdell's Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction: A Compendium of Species-Specific Data. Ithaca and London: Cornell University PRess.

Nowak, R. 1995. "Walker's Mammals of the World Online" (On-line). Accessed November 19, 2001 at http://www.press.jhu.edu/books/walker/artiodactyla.bovidae.hemitragus.html.

Pare, P., C. Barrette, J. Prescott. 1996. Seasonal reproduction of captive Himalayan tahrs (*Hemitragus jemlahicus*) in relation to latitude. Journal of Mammalogy, 77(3): 826-832.

Tustin, K. 1990. Himalayan Tahr. Pp. 392-406 in C. King, ed. The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

Williams, D. April 5, 2001. "Checklist of California Mammals" (On-line). Accessed November 19, 2001 at http://arnica.csustain.edu/esrpp/calilist.htm.

2008/05/11 04:40:02.290 GMT-4

To cite this page: Kennedy, S. 2002. "Hemitragus jemlahicus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed May 15, 2008 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Hemitragus_jemlahicus.html.

Disclaimer: The Animal Diversity Web is an educational resource written largely by and for college students. ADW doesn't cover all species in the world, nor does it include all the latest scientific information about organisms we describe. Though we edit our accounts for accuracy, we cannot guarantee all information in those accounts. While ADW staff and contributors provide references to books and websites that we believe are reputable, we cannot necessarily endorse the contents of references beyond our control.

Other formats: OWL

Home  ¦  About Us  ¦  Special Topics  ¦  Teaching  ¦  About Animal Names  ¦  Help

Structured Inquiry Search — preview