Animal Diversity Web U of M Museum of Zoology ADW Home ADW Home ADW Home University of Michigan Help About Aninal Names Teaching Special Topics About Us




Structured Inquiry Search — preview

Home -> Kingdom Animalia -> Phylum Chordata -> Subphylum Vertebrata -> Class Mammalia -> Order Artiodactyla -> Family Bovidae -> Subfamily Caprinae -> Species Hemitragus hylocrius

Hemitragus hylocrius
Nilgiri tahr



2010/02/07 03:06:10.060 US/Eastern

By Adam Herman

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Family: Bovidae
Subfamily: Caprinae
Genus: Hemitragus
Species: Hemitragus hylocrius

Geographic Range

Nilgiri tahrs (Hemitragus hylocrius) were once abundant in grass-woodland mosaic habitat in rugged hills and mountain slopes of the southern Indian states of Kerala and Tamil Nadu. The endangered Nilgiri tahrs are endemic to the Western Ghats Mountains in south India. They are now limited to some 17 populations in the Nilgiri, Anamalai, Palani and Highwavy Hills, the Eravikulam area of the High Range, and possibly a few other mountains in the Western Ghats. (Mishra and Johnsingh, 1998; Rice, 1988)

Biogeographic Regions:
oriental .

Habitat

Elevation
1200 to 2200 m; avg. 1700 m
(3936 to 7216 ft; avg. 5576 ft)


They prefer grass-woodland mosaic habitat in rugged hills, mountain slopes and plateaus at altitudes ranging from 1,200-2,200 m. Nilgiri tahr frequent the fringes of the grass-covered plateaus dominated by two main types of grass, Eulalia phaeotrix and Andropogon polyptichus. (Davidar, 1978; Rice, 1986; Rice, 1988)

These animals are found in the following types of habitat:
tropical ; terrestrial .

Terrestrial Biomes:
scrub forest ; mountains .

Physical Description

Mass
50 to 100 kg; avg. 75 kg
(110 to 220 lbs; avg. 165 lbs)


Length
90 to 140 cm
(35.43 to 55.12 in)


Nilgiri tahrs are goat-like animals with a short coat and short, laterally flattened and curved horns. Males are black with a silver saddle and bristly mane, while females are grayish brown with white bellies also having latterly-flattened curved horns. Measurements of these animals are as follows: head and body length 90-140 cm; height at the shoulder 61-106 cm; tail length 9-12 cm; weight 50-100 kg. (Nowak, 1991; Rice, 1988)

Some key physical features:
endothermic ; bilateral symmetry .

Sexual dimorphism: male larger, sexes colored or patterned differently, ornamentation .

Reproduction

Breeding interval
Breeding occurs twice yearly.

Breeding season
Mating occurs throughout the year but may peak in winter.

Number of offspring
1 to 2; avg. 1

Gestation period
6 to 8.07 months; avg. 7.03 months

Age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
669 days (average)
[External Source: AnAge]


Nilgiri tahrs are polygynous, males compete for access to females through battles. Males will mate with as many females as they can gain access to. (Nowak, 1991)

Mating systems:
polygynous .

Mating takes place throughout the year, but there is a birth peak in winter. Wild Nilgiri tahrs rarely give birth to twins. A single offspring is born after a gestation period of 180-242 days, and females can give birth twice in one year. Reproductive output varies greatly from year to year. Nilgiri tahrs breed well in captivity. (Rice, 1988; World Conservation Monitoring Center, 2001)

Key reproductive features:
iteroparous ; year-round breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; viviparous .

Females nurse and care for their offspring until they reach independence.

Parental investment:
altricial ; female parental care ; post-independence association with parents.

Lifespan/Longevity

Typical lifespan (wild)


Nilgiri tahrs have a relatively short life expectancy. Life expectancy at birth is estimated to be 3-3.5 years, though they may live longer. (Rice, 1988)

Behavior

Nilgiri tahrs are active intermittently from dawn to dusk and are primarily grazers, living in herds ranging from 6 – 104 animals, with average group sizes of 9 for all-female groups and 27 for mixed herds. Males battle on mountain slopes in competition for mates. (Davidar, 1978; Rice, 1988; Schaller, 1977)

Key behaviors:
terricolous; diurnal ; crepuscular ; motile ; nomadic ; territorial ; social ; dominance hierarchies .

Communication and Perception

The primary modes of communication are visual, auditory and olfactory. Pheromones released in their urine communicate information about mate identification and reproductive activity, spacing mechanisms, and alarm. (Nowak, 1991)

Communicates with:
visual ; acoustic ; chemical .

Other communication keywords:
pheromones ; scent marks .

Perception channels:
visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical .

Food Habits

Preferred foods include various grasses and forbs. Species included among these various forage types are Eulalia phaeothrix, Andropogon polyptichus, Chrysopogon zelan, Eupatorium adenophoru, Strobilanthes kunthianus and Cymbopogon spp. (Rice, 1988)

Primary Diet:
herbivore (folivore ).

Plant Foods:
leaves.

Predation

Known predators

Anti-predator adaptions in Nilgiri tahrs include group defense and using horns for defense. Native predators of the Nilgiri tahr are the tiger (Panthera tigris), Indian wolves (Canis lupus) and dholes (Cuon alpinus). Another major predator are humans who poach these animals by means of shooting and snaring. (Mishra and Johnsingh, 1998; World Conservation Monitoring Center, 2001)

Ecosystem Roles

Nilgiri tahrs serve as a food source for predators such as tigers, wolves, and dholes. Their grazing maintains grass levels, which suppresses the probability of fire in grassland communities. (Schaller, 1977)

Key ways these animals impact their ecosystem:
disperses seeds.

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

These animals may compete for grazing with domestic livestock. (World Conservation Monitoring Center, 2001)

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

Nilgiri tahrs are a valuable source of protein and income for local people. Unfortunately, poaching is the primary means of harvesting this animal. Therefore, this may be a positive economic importance for the local people but the continued poaching may eventually lead to the demise of the species. (Rice, 1988)

Ways that people benefit from these animals:
food ; body parts are source of valuable material; ecotourism .

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List: [link]:
Endangered.

US Federal List: [link]:
No special status.

CITES: [link]:
No special status.

Nilgiri tahrs have been protected by government law in India since 1972. These animals are likely candidates for reintroduction and also breed well in captivity. They are not only threatened by poaching, they are threatened by grazing, competition with domestic stock, hydroelectric projects, and habitat loss to agriculture and eucalyptus and wattle plantations. Ecological studies are needed to form a basis of management plans since sustainable harvesting and/or licensed sport hunting of a restored population could be a valuable source of protein and income for local people in a safe and legal mannerr. (World Conservation Monitoring Center, 2001)

In 1986 total numbers were estimated at 2,000 – 2,200, relatively unchanged since 1978. Available evidence suggests that the three largest populations have remained approximately stable in recent years. The largest known populations consist of nearly 550 animals each existing in the Eravikulam and Nilgiri Hills National Parks. These two populations comprise approximately 50% of the remaining animals. The remaining populations are of less than 100 animals. (Davidar, 1978; Rice, 1986; Rice, 1988)

For More Information

Find Hemitragus hylocrius information at

Contributors

Adam Herman (author), University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point.
Chris Yahnke (editor), University of Wisconsin Stevens Point.

References

Davidar, E. 1978. Distribution and status of the Nilgiri tahr (*Hemitragus hylocrius*). Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 75: 815-844.

Mishra, C., A. Johnsingh. 1998. Population and conservation status of the Nilgiri tahr *Hemitragus hylocrius* in Anamalai Hills, South India. Biological Conservation, 86: 199-206.

Nowak, R. 1991. Walker's Mammals of the World, 5th edn. Baltimore and London: University Press.

Rice, C. 1986. Conservation of Tahr. Caprinae News, 1: 7-9.

Rice, C. 1988. Habitat, Population Dynamics, and Conservation of the Nilgiri tahr, *Hemitragus hylocrius*. Biological Conservation, 44: 137-156.

Schaller, G. 1977. Mountain Monarchs. Chicago, USA: Univ. of Chicago Press.

World Conservation Monitoring Center. 2001. "Status accounts for selected threatened Indian mammals" (On-line ). Accessed 30 October 2002 at http://www.wcmc.org.uk/igcmc/rl_anml/indmams.html.

2010/02/07 03:06:11.673 US/Eastern

To cite this page: Herman, A. 2004. "Hemitragus hylocrius" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed February 09, 2010 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Hemitragus_hylocrius.html.

Disclaimer: The Animal Diversity Web is an educational resource written largely by and for college students. ADW doesn't cover all species in the world, nor does it include all the latest scientific information about organisms we describe. Though we edit our accounts for accuracy, we cannot guarantee all information in those accounts. While ADW staff and contributors provide references to books and websites that we believe are reputable, we cannot necessarily endorse the contents of references beyond our control.

Other formats: OWL

Home  ¦  About Us  ¦  Special Topics  ¦  Teaching  ¦  About Animal Names  ¦  Help

Structured Inquiry Search — preview