Animal Diversity Web U of M Museum of Zoology ADW Home ADW Home ADW Home University of Michigan Help About Aninal Names Teaching Special Topics About Us




Structured Inquiry Search — preview

Home -> Kingdom Animalia -> Phylum Chordata -> Subphylum Vertebrata -> Class Mammalia -> Order Primates -> Suborder Strepsirrhini -> Family Galagidae -> Species Galago thomasi

Galago thomasi
Thomas's bushbaby



2009/11/29 02:54:43.836 US/Eastern

By Jeremy Phan

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Suborder: Strepsirrhini
Family: Galagidae
Genus: Galago
Species: Galago thomasi

Geographic Range

The range of Thomas’s bushbabies extends from Cote d'Ivoire through Cameroon, Angola, and Congo-Zaire to Uganda, Tanzania, and Zambia, and possibly northern Kenya around Mount Marsabit. They may occur in several other African countries but due to recent taxonomic changes this has yet to be clarified. ("The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species", 2008; Groves, 2001; Perkin and Bearder, 2004)

Biogeographic Regions:
ethiopian (native ).

Habitat

Elevation
2000 m (high)
(6560 ft)


Thomas’s bushbabies are found in a variety of different habitats, including primary and secondary forests, marshy areas, gallery forest, savanna, and open woodlands such as miombo. They inhabit both lowland forests and highland forest and wooded areas up to 2000 meters. ("The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species", 2008; Rowe, 1996)

These animals are found in the following types of habitat:
tropical ; terrestrial .

Wetlands: marsh , swamp .

Other:
riparian .

Physical Description

Mass
55 to 149 g; avg. 99 g
(1.94 to 5.24 oz; avg. 3.48 oz)


Length
123 to 166 mm; avg. 146 mm
(4.84 to 6.54 in; avg. 5.75 in)


Thomas’s bushbabies are brownish-grey with grey underparts, prominent dark eye patches, narrow faces, and dark rostra. Thomas’s bushbabies resemble Prince Demidoff’s bushbabies (Galago demidoff). Although not typically visible in the field, a distinguishing feature is the genital morphology of Thomas’s bushbabies, which differs from all other members of the Galagidae family. The body length of Galago thomasi averages 146 mm, with a range of 123 to 166 mm, tail length averages 261 mm, ranging from 150 to 233 mm. Thomas’s bushbabies weigh, on average, 99 g, but varies in weight from 55 to 149 g. Males are larger than females. (Rowe, 1996)

Some key physical features:
endothermic ; homoiothermic; bilateral symmetry .

Reproduction

Breeding interval
Thomas's bushbabies breed year round.

Breeding season
Although Thomas's bushbabies breed year round, most births occur from January through April.

Number of offspring
1 to 2; avg. 1

Studies of the reproductive behavior of Galago thomasi are lacking. In other members of the family Galagidae for which data are available, the mating systems consist of polygynous multi-male groups. Male galagos have a baculum, and there are typically species-specific differences in penile morphology among the Galagidae. (Macdonald, 2001)

Although data are lacking for G. thomasi, other galagos, such as Galago demidoff, breed year-round. Typically they reproduce between January and April. Information on the gestation period and the number of offspring born are not available for Galago thomasi, however, in Galago demidoff females have a gestation period of 111 to 114 days and one young at a time. Offspring in G. demidoff are weaned at around 53 days of age and reach sexual maturity at an age of 8 to 10 months. (Llorente, Pi, and Houle, 2003; Rowe, 1996)

Key reproductive features:
iteroparous ; year-round breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; viviparous .

There is no information currently on parental investment in G. thomasi and whether or not there are male and female contributions to the care of offspring. In other Galago species females primarily care for the young and generally hide them in a protected spot while they forage. Males may provide some indirect care for young through protecting foraging areas and there is some evidence that males may associate with females and their young on occasion.

Parental investment:
pre-fertilization (provisioning, protecting: female); pre-hatching/birth (provisioning: female, protecting: female); pre-weaning/fledging (provisioning: female, protecting: female).

Lifespan/Longevity

The lifespan of Galago thomasi is not reported in the literature. The closely related Galago demidoff has been known to live 13 years in the captivity. (Rowe, 1996)

Behavior

Territory Size
0.01 to 0.01 km^2

Thomas’s bushbabies are both nocturnal and arboreal. They spend much of their waking time foraging solitarily. They inhabit higher levels of the forest, usually above 20 meters. After foraging for the night individuals usually come together in the early morning hours before dawn. They have been found sleeping together as well. Group dynamics are considered complex, but groups are highly dispersed during foraging periods. They have been observed allogrooming when meeting one another and they make many postural motions with their bodies. Compared to Galago matschei, G. thomasi uses arboreal quadrupedalism more, although both species make much use of leaping. Thomas’s bushbabies primarily use small, oblique, mid-canopy branches. In Kibale Forest, Uganda, Thomas’s bushbabies were reported nesting in the night nest of a common chimpanzee Pan troglodytes, despite the fact that chimpanzees regularly prey upon galagos. (Macdonald, 2001; Off and Gebo, 2005)

Home Range

Home range size in Thomas’s bushbabies is not known. In another species, Galago demidoff, the home range was found to be 0.6 to 1.4 ha. (Rowe, 1996)

Key behaviors:
arboreal ; scansorial; saltatorial ; nocturnal ; motile ; sedentary ; solitary ; territorial ; social .

Communication and Perception

The facial markings of the different species in the family Galagidae may help them distinguish one individual from another when they come into contact. Galago thomasi individuals use chemical cues extensively. They have a scent gland near the anal region that is used in scent marking to communicate with conspecifics. They also urinate on their cupped hands, then spread the urine on their feet, so it is spread when they walk. This behavior, urine-washing, is more frequent in males than females, and is carried out in a variety of situations. Thomas’s bushbabies also have species-specific calls: they have a rolling call that rises to a crescendo and is then repeated several times. These calls can be used to communicate position to one another as well as to indicate mood. Tactile communication takes the form of nose-to-nose sniffing then nose-to-face contact when conspecifics first encounter each other. They also reciprocally lick each other, depositing saliva and sometimes urine. ("Thomas's Galago (Galago thomasi)", 2007; Macdonald, 2001)

Communicates with:
visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical .

Other communication keywords:
scent marks .

Perception channels:
visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical .

Food Habits

Like other galagos, Thomas’s bushbabies eat a variety of foods, but are primarily insectivorous. They consume small vertebrates and insects, fruit, tree buds and leaves, as well as tree gums. They use their large ears to listen for insects and small vertebrates and have been known to catch insects in mid-air. ("Thomas's Galago (Galago thomasi)", 2007; Macdonald, 2001; Rowe, 1996)

Primary Diet:
carnivore (insectivore ); omnivore .

Animal Foods:
reptiles; insects; terrestrial non-insect arthropods.

Plant Foods:
seeds, grains, and nuts; fruit; sap or other plant fluids.

Predation

Known predators

Because of their small size, Thomas’s bushbabies are likely to be preyed on by nocturnal predators such as small carnivores and owls. During the daytime, even though they sleep in small tree hollows or crevices, galagos are not always safe from predators. Common chimpanzees Pan troglodytes have been observed using a stick as a spear in order to reach a sleeping Galago demidoff in its nest and it seems likely they would prey upon G. thomasi as well. Arboreal snakes may also be a threat. ("Predation on Mammals by the Chimpanzee", 1997; Macdonald, 2001)

Anti-predator adaptations::
cryptic .

Ecosystem Roles

Thomas’s bushbabies help to disperse seeds of the fruits that they eat. They also presumably serve as prey for smaller forest carnivores and regulate arthropod communities through their predation. Trypanosomes have been found in the blood of Thomas’s bushbabies in Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. ("Predation on Mammals by the Chimpanzee", 1997; Van Den Berghe and Peel, 2007)

Key ways these animals impact their ecosystem:
disperses seeds.

Commensal or parasitic species (or larger taxonomic groups) that use this species as a host
  • trypanosomes (Trypanosomatida)

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

There are no known negative impacts of Thomas’s bushbabies on humans.

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

Thomas’s bushbabies do not play any major economic roles for humans. They may provoke some interest by ecotourists, but they are active at night and rarely observed.

Ways that people benefit from these animals:
ecotourism .

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List: [link]:
Not Evaluated.

US Federal List: [link]:
No special status.

CITES: [link]:
No special status.

The IUCN lists Galago thomasi as lower risk/least concern. This status is due to their adaptability to different types of environments rather than reliance on primary and secondary rainforests that are being destroyed by humans in Africa for agriculture. With education both for the local people where the animals live and educating the general public on the importance of natural ecosystems Galago thomasi may be able to stay listed as lower risk least concern. ("The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species", 2008)

For More Information

Find Galago thomasi information at

Contributors

Tanya Dewey (editor), Animal Diversity Web, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.

Jeremy Phan (author), Michigan State University. Pamela Rasmussen external link (editor, instructor), Michigan State University.

References

1997. Predation on Mammals by the Chimpanzee. Primates, 38(2): 193-214. Accessed September 04, 2008 at http://www.springerlink.com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu:2047/content/547k647u01073811/fulltext.pdf.

2008. "The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species" (On-line). Galagoides thomasi. Accessed February 01, 2009 at http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/40653.

2007. "Thomas's Galago (Galago thomasi)" (On-line). Accessed February 01, 2009 at http://www.theprimata.com/galago_thomasi.html.

Groves, C. 2001. Primate Taxonomy. United States of America: Smithsonian Institution.

Llorente, M., J. Pi, A. Houle. 2003. Association between Galago thomasi and Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii in the Kibale National Park, Uganda. Folia Primatologica, 74(2): 80-84. Accessed February 01, 2009 at http://content.karger.com/ProdukteDB/produkte.asp?Aktion=ShowAbstract&ProduktNr=223842&Ausgabe=229116&ArtikelNr=70001.

Macdonald, D. 2001. The Encyclopedia of Mammals. London: The Brown Reference Group.

Off, E., D. Gebo. 2005. Galago locomotion in Kibale National Park, Uganda. American Journal of Primatology, 66(2): 189-195. Accessed February 01, 2009 at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/110521106/abstract.

Perkin, A., S. Bearder. 2004. "Minziro Forest reveals new galago and bat records for Tanzania" (On-line). The Arc Journal. Accessed February 01, 2009 at http://www.tfcg.org/pdf/arc_article4.pdf.

Rowe, N. 1996. The Pictorial Guide to Living Primates. Hong Kong: Pogonias Press.

Van Den Berghe, L., M. Peel. 2007. Trypanosomes of the African lemurs, Perodicticus potto ibeanus and Galago demidovi thomasi. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 10(2): 133-135. Accessed February 01, 2009 at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119743427/abstract.

2009/11/29 02:54:45.636 US/Eastern

To cite this page: Phan, J. and P. Rasmussen. 2009. "Galago thomasi" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed December 01, 2009 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Galago_thomasi.html.

Disclaimer: The Animal Diversity Web is an educational resource written largely by and for college students. ADW doesn't cover all species in the world, nor does it include all the latest scientific information about organisms we describe. Though we edit our accounts for accuracy, we cannot guarantee all information in those accounts. While ADW staff and contributors provide references to books and websites that we believe are reputable, we cannot necessarily endorse the contents of references beyond our control.

Other formats: OWL

Home  ¦  About Us  ¦  Special Topics  ¦  Teaching  ¦  About Animal Names  ¦  Help

Structured Inquiry Search — preview