Animal Diversity Web U of M Museum of Zoology ADW Home ADW Home ADW Home University of Michigan Help About Aninal Names Teaching Special Topics About Us




Structured Inquiry Search — preview

Home -> Kingdom Animalia -> Phylum Chordata -> Subphylum Vertebrata -> Class Mammalia -> Order Carnivora -> Suborder Feliformia -> Family Eupleridae

Family Eupleridae
Malagasy carnivores



2010/02/07 02:50:53.438 US/Eastern

By Allison Poor

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Suborder: Feliformia
Family: Eupleridae
Members of this Family

Diversity

The family Eupleridae, the Malagasy carnivores, consists of eight species and seven genera in two subfamilies. The diversity of form and function in this family is such that some have suggested it be split into several families. (Gaubert et al., 2005; Wilson and Reeder, 2005)

Geographic Range

Species in the family Eupleridae are restricted to the island of Madagascar. (Nowak, 1999)

Biogeographic Regions:
ethiopian (native ).

Other Geographic Terms:
island endemic .

Habitat

Euplerids live in a variety of habitats, from humid forests, marshes, bogs, and swamps, to deserts and savannahs. (Nowak, 1999; Schreiber et al., 1989)

These animals are found in the following types of habitat:
temperate ; tropical ; terrestrial .

Wetlands: marsh , swamp , bog .

Systematic and Taxonomic History

The taxonomic position of the species in the family Eupleridae has been in question since their discovery. Most authors have placed them in Viverridae and Herpestidae. In some cases each species was assigned to its own family (Wozencraft 2005). Cryptoprocta was also thought to be a felid due to its skull shape, dentition, and features of the skeleton (Hemmer 1978). One genus, Eupleres, was even classified outside of Carnivora. Because of its pointed snout and small, sharp teeth, Eupleres was thought to be an insectivore when it was first discovered (Doyère 1835). More recently euplerid species were placed within Viverridae, in the subfamily Euplerinae (Wozencraft 1989) or Fossinae (Wozencraft 1993). Molecular phylogenies based on cytochrome b, ND2, transthyretin intron I, and IRBP genes strongly supports euplerid monophyly and a sister relationship to Herpestidae (Yoder et al. 2003). A recent phylogenetic analysis based on 349 morphological characteristics does not support euplerid monophyly; Eupleres and Fossa form a clade, while Cryptoprocta and Galidia fall elsewhere. The authors suggest that the dramatic morphological differences among euplerid species may justify splitting them into separate families (Gaubert et al. 2005). (Doyère, 1835; Gaubert et al., 2005; Hemmer, 1978; Wozencraft, 1989; Wozencraft, 1993; Wozencraft, 2005; Yoder et al., 2003)

Synonyms
Synapomorphies
  • Synapomorphies resulting from a phylogenetic analysis of cytochrome b, ND2, transthyretin intron I, and IRBP genes.

Physical Description

Aside from molecular synapomorphies, euplerids have few traits in common. They tend to have slender bodies with relatively small heads and pointed rostra, although fossas (Cryptoprocta ferox) are more cat-like in appearance, with blunt snouts. Head and body length ranges from 250 mm in Mungotictis and Salanoia to 800 mm in adult male Cryptoprocta. The thick, soft pelage is gray or brown, and spotted or striped in all but Eupleres and Cryptoprocta. The foot posture is plantigrade or digitigrade. (Nowak, 1999)

Some key physical features:
endothermic ; homoiothermic; bilateral symmetry .

Reproduction

Mating systems in Eupleridae vary, as social structure varies from species to species. Fossas form monogamous pairs, while species in the genera Galidia, Mungotictis, and Salanoia are either found alone or in pairs, suggesting that they are monogamous within, but not across, breeding seasons. Species in the genera Eupleres and Galidictis live alone, in pairs, or in small family groups, which also might indicate monogamy. Mungotictis individuals live in small groups with several adults of each sex, but it is not known whether all of the adults within a group breed. Cryptoprocta individuals are strictly solitary, suggesting a polygynous or polygynandrous mating system. (Nowak, 1999)

Euplerids have definite breeding seasons, which vary by species and last anywhere from two to eight months. Gestation lasts around three months. Usually there are just one or two young per litter, though Cryptoprocta can have up to four. Weaning takes place between two and four and a half months. (Nowak, 1999)

Key reproductive features:
semelparous ; seasonal breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; fertilization ; viviparous .

Like all eutherian mammals, euplerid females nuture their young through a placenta until the young are born. They then provide their offspring with milk for two to four and a half months. Females of some genera, such as Cryptoprocta, select dens in which to bear and nurse their young. Mungotictis individuals live in family groups of several adults, juveniles, and young; thus, offspring have an association with their parents beyond weaning. (Nowak, 1999)

Parental investment:
pre-fertilization (provisioning, protecting: female); pre-hatching/birth (provisioning: female, protecting: female); pre-weaning/fledging (provisioning: female, protecting: male, female); pre-independence (provisioning: female, protecting: male, female); post-independence association with parents.

Lifespan/Longevity

Euplerid lifespans in the wild are unknown. Cryptoprocta holds the longevity record in captivity, at 20 years. (Nowak, 1999)

Behavior

Euplerids exhibit a range of lifestyles, from diurnal to nocturnal, and from arboreal to terrestrial. When they are not active, they shelter in protected spots, such as tree hollows, crevices, burrows, or caves. Locomotion is plantigrade or digitigrade. Mungotictis decemlineata have partially webbed toes and are good swimmers. As mentioned above, social habits range from strictly solitary to group living. Some species (Fossa and Cryptoprocta) vigorously defend territories against other pairs or individuals. (Nowak, 1999)

Key behaviors:
arboreal ; scansorial; terricolous; diurnal ; nocturnal ; crepuscular ; motile ; sedentary ; solitary ; territorial ; social .

Communication and Perception

Like other carnivores, euplerids can perceive visual, acoustic, chemical, and tactile signals. Communication is through scent in the form of glandular secretions and through a variety of cries, groans, and other vocalizations. (Nowak, 1999)

Communicates with:
acoustic ; chemical .

Other communication keywords:
scent marks .

Perception channels:
visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical .

Food Habits

Euplerids are primarily carnivorous, consuming small mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs, insects, crustaceans, and other invertebrates. Eupleres goudotii is specialized for eating intertebrates such as earthworms. Fossa fossana and Galidia elegans may include some fruit in their diets in addition to animal matter. (Nowak, 1999)

Primary Diet:
carnivore (eats terrestrial vertebrates, eats eggs, insectivore , eats non-insect arthropods); herbivore (frugivore ); omnivore .

Predation

Known predators

No information is available on the specific predators of euplerids, besides humans and domestic dogs, both of which are not native to Madagascar. Cryptic coloration in the form of spots and stripes on neutral backgrounds probably conceals most species well. Eupleres goudotii is known to either run or freeze when disturbed, and Cryptoprocta ferox releases a foul-smelling substance from its anal glands when it is alarmed. Large birds of prey or large snakes are potential predators. (Nowak, 1999; Schreiber et al., 1989)

Anti-predator adaptations::
cryptic .

Ecosystem Roles

Euplerids that eat fruit are primary consumers, and all euplerids are secondary and higher-level consumers, because they eat a variety of animal matter. They, in turn, are eaten by humans and domestic dogs, and possibly other predators as well. Cryptoprocta ferox is the largest native predator on Madagascar and, except for humans, is at the top of the food chain. (Nowak, 1999; Schreiber et al., 1989)

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

Cryptoprocta ferox individuals sometimes attack poultry. There are no reports of other euplerids negatively affecting humans. (Nowak, 1999; Schreiber et al., 1989)

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

Euplerids are commonly hunted for their meat. (Nowak, 1999; Schreiber et al., 1989)

Ways that people benefit from these animals:
food .

Conservation

All species in this family are threatened. Fossa fossana, Galidia elegans, Galidictis fasciata, and Salanoia concolor are considered vulnerable by the IUCN, and Cryptoprocta ferox, Eupleres goudotii, Galidictis grandidieri, and Mungotictis decemlineata are considered endangered. Cryptoprocta ferox, Eupleres goudotii, and Fossa fossana are on Appendix II of CITES. Habitat destruction in the form of deforestation is the main cause of their decline, though hunting by humans and predation by dogs also impact populations. (IUCN, 2006; Nowak, 1999; Schreiber et al., 1989)

Contributors

Allison Poor (author), University of Michigan.
Tanya Dewey (editor), Animal Diversity Web, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.

References

Doyère, P. 1835. Description d'un nouveau genre de mammifières carnassiers. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles, 3: 45.

Gaubert, P., W. Wozencraft, P. Cordeiro-Estrela, G. Veron. 2005. Mosaics of convergences and noise in morphological phylogenies: What's in a viverrid-like carnivoran?. Systematic Biology, 54(6): 865-894.

Hemmer, H. 1978. The evolutionary systematics of living Felidae: Present status and current problems. Carnivore, 1: 71-79.

IUCN, 2006. "2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species" (On-line). Accessed September 19, 2006 at www.redlist.org.

Nowak, R. 1999. Walker's Mammals of the World. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Schreiber, A., R. Wirth, M. Riffel, H. Van Rompaey. 1989. Weasels, Civets, Mongooses, and their Relatives. An Action Plan for the Conservation of Mustelids and Viverrids. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.

Wilson, D., D. Reeder. 2005. Mammal Species of the World. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Wozencraft, W. 1989. Classification of the recent Carnivora. Pp. 569-593 in J. L. Gittleman, ed. Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

Wozencraft, W. 1993. Order Carnivora. Pp. 279-348 in D. E. Wilson, D. M. Reeder, eds. Mammal Species of the World. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Wozencraft, W. 2005. Order Carnivora. Pp. 532-628 in D. E. Wilson, D. M. Reeder, eds. Mammal Species of the World. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Yoder, A., M. Burns, S. Zehr, T. Delefosse, G. Veron, S. Goodman, J. Flynn. 2003. Single origin of Malagasy Carnivora from an African ancestor. Nature, 421: 734-737.

2010/02/07 02:50:56.884 US/Eastern

To cite this page: Poor, A. 2006. "Eupleridae" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed February 09, 2010 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Eupleridae.html.

Disclaimer: The Animal Diversity Web is an educational resource written largely by and for college students. ADW doesn't cover all species in the world, nor does it include all the latest scientific information about organisms we describe. Though we edit our accounts for accuracy, we cannot guarantee all information in those accounts. While ADW staff and contributors provide references to books and websites that we believe are reputable, we cannot necessarily endorse the contents of references beyond our control.

Other formats: OWL

Home  ¦  About Us  ¦  Special Topics  ¦  Teaching  ¦  About Animal Names  ¦  Help

Structured Inquiry Search — preview