Animal Diversity WebU of M Museum of Zoology ADW Home ADW Home ADW Home University of Michigan Help About Aninal Names Teaching Special Topics About Us



Structured Inquiry Search — preview

Bothrops asper


By Kelly Brown

Species: Bothrops asper

Geographic Range

The range of Bothrops colombiensis includes the northwestern coast of South America from Ecuador to Venezuela, Trinidad, and north as far as Mexico. More specifically, in Mexico and Central America Bothrops colombiensis is found north to the Southern Tamaulipas and south to the Southeastern Yucatan Peninsula. It dwells in the lowland Atlantic coastal areas of Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Terciopelos (Bothrops colombiensis) are also found in the northern areas of both Guatamala and Honduras. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004; O'Shea, 2005; Sasa, et al., 2009)

In South America these vipers are typically found west and north of the Andes, though there are exceptions, most notably in Venezuela where it can be found in the San Cristobal and Barquiseto Depressions in the Southeast region of the country. Bothrops colombiensis is found on the Pacfic coastal plains and Andes Pacific versant from Columbia to as far south as the border of Peru and Ecuador. These snakes are also found in Northern Peru near the Pacific coast. In Columbia their range extends from the Pacific to the Carribean coastal plain as well as deeper within the country in the valleys of the Andes. Bothrops colombiensis lives in sympatry with Bothrops atrox in central northern Columbia and certain areas of Venezuela. Bothrops atrox typically ranges further south in the Amazonian countries, but due to its similar appearance and overlapping distribution of Bothrops colombiensis the snakes are often mistaken for one another. To further confusion, Bothrops colombiensis was once considered a subspecies of B. atrox. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004; Sasa, et al., 2009)

Biogeographic Regions
neotropical (Native )

Habitat

Range elevation
Sea Level to 2640 m
( to 8661.42 ft)

Bothrops colombiensis is primarily found in the tropical rainforest, the tropical evergreen forest, and the outer edge of savannas, but has also been found in a wide variety of other habitats including lowland and lower mountainous regions, dry regions of some tropical deciduous forests, and the cloud forests of Mexico. Bothrops colombiensis prefers higher levels of humidity but adults may be found in desert areas as they are at less risk for dehydration than their juvenile counterparts. In Ecuador, Terciopelos inhabit the low montane wet and dry forests as well as the coastal cloud forests. Bothrops colombiensis is known to move in to newly cleared agricultural land areas in many countries as well as the forested uplands in Trinidad. These vipers are mainly terrestrial, but some juveniles are known to climb trees. They have been documented at elevations from sea level to 2,640 m above sea level. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004; Cisneros-Heredia and Touzet, 2004; O'Shea, 2005)

Habitat Regions
tropical ; terrestrial

Terrestrial Biomes
desert or dune ; savanna or grassland ; forest ; scrub forest ; mountains

Aquatic Biomes
coastal

Other Habitat Features
agricultural

Physical Description

Range mass
6 (high) kg
(13.22 (high) lb)

Range length
2.5 (high) m
(8.20 (high) ft)

Average length
1.2 to 1.8 m
( ft)

Members of the genus Bothrops are distinguished by their broad, flattened heads which are set apart from the rest of the body. Their eye lids (canthus) are very distinct. In drier regions, terciopelos have more scales to prevent water loss. Bothrops colombiensis varies greatly phenotypically across its geographic range. This has led to the confusion between it and other species, most notably Bothrops atrox, which is similar in color but often contains yellow or rust like tones and rectangular or trapezoidal blotches. The head of Bothrops colombiensis is medium to dark brown or even black. It may have occipital botches or streaks that range from indistinct to distinct, but usually are absent. The underside is most often pale yellow. Individuals may weigh up to 6 kg and typically measure 1.2 to 1.8 m in length. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004; O'Shea, 2005; Saldarriaga-Córdoba, et al., 2009; United States Navy, 1962)

Like most other Bothrops, B. asper has different patterns and colors on its dorsal and ventral sides and also exhibits a postorbital stripe. The ventral side is yellow, cream, or a whitish gray, with dark blotches (mottling) that increases in frequency towards the posterior end. Ventrolaterally, the viper has alternating dark gray scales which are paler towards the medial line. Dorsally, the viper is olive, gray, brown, grayish brown, tan or at times nearly black. It has dark triangles with pale edges laterally, which range in number from 18 to 25. Apices either alternate or are reflective of each other over the middorsal line. In the interspaces, there are dark, paravertebral blotches. An individual may have a yellow zig-zag shaped line on each side of the body. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004)

Terciopelos exhibit great sexual dimorphism. From birth, males are notably smaller in size than females. Females have thick, heavy bodies and can reach up to 10 times the size of males. Males have 161 to 216 ventral scales and 57 to 81 subcaudals. Females have 187 to 240 ventrals and 46 to 70 subcaudals. Juvenile females have a brown tail tip while males have a yellow tail tip. Prior to sexual maturation, males completely lose their yellow tip. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004; Sasa, et al., 2009)

Other Physical Features
ectothermic ; heterothermic ; bilateral symmetry ; venomous

Sexual Dimorphism
female larger; sexes colored or patterned differently

Development

Bothrops colombiensis is viviparous, making development to the neonatal/juvenile state internal. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004; Sasa, et al., 2009; Solórzano and Cerdas, 1989)

Reproduction

Unlike many vipers, there are no documented cases of male-male combat in Bothrops colombiensis. Often females will mate with more than one male in a mating season. Mating includes a series of movements of the male who then slowly chases an accepting female. He often bobs his head at her side. The female then stops movement and extends her posture to mate. It is not known whether this species exhibits annual or biennial reproduction. (Sasa, et al., 2009; Solórzano and Cerdas, 1989)

Mating System
polyandrous

Breeding interval
Bothrops colombiensis breads once yearly.

Breeding season
Breeding season for Bothrops colombiensis varies. Some populations are known to mate in March, and give birth in September-November. Others mate from September to November and parturition occurs from April to June.

Range number of offspring
5 to 86

Range gestation period
6 to 8 months

Range birth mass
6.1 to 20.2 g
(0.21 to 0.71 oz)

Bothrops colombiensis is considered the most prolific snake in all of the Americas. It breeds seasonally, usually during the rainy season when food is readily available. Males are known to follow females during the mating season in some regions. Fertilization is internal. Because terciopelos have a large geographic range, the time and length of reproduction varies greatly. For instance, in the Atlantic population of Costa Rica, B. asper mates in March, but in the Pacific region, it mates from September to November. This variation continues throughout Central and South America. There is a positive correlation between the body size of the female parent and the number of offspring she produces. After a gestation period of 6 to 8 months, females give birth to 5 to 86 viviparous young. These young terciopelos weigh between 6.1 and 20.2 grams each. There is also some evidence of long term sperm storage by the females to delay fertilization. Females are 110 to 120 cm at sexual maturity, while males average at 99.5 cm. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004; Sasa, et al., 2009; Solórzano and Cerdas, 1989)

Key Reproductive Features
iteroparous ; seasonal breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; viviparous ; sperm-storing ; delayed fertilization

Females build up fat stores which lead to a release in hormones that stimulate ovulation. Females gestate for 6 to 8 months before giving birth to live young. There is no parental care.

Parental Investment
pre-fertilization (Provisioning, Protecting: Female); pre-hatching/birth (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female)

Lifespan/Longevity

Range lifespan
Status: captivity

15 to 21 years

Recapture of the species is uncommon, so longevity in the wild is unknown. However, it is estimated that lifespan in the wild is similar to that in captivity, which ranges from 15 to 21 years based on zoo-keeping records. (Bowler, 1977; Sasa, et al., 2009)

Behavior

Range territory size
59,500 (high) m^2

Average territory size
37,100 m^2

Like much of Bothrops, B. asper is a nocturnal, solitary species. Activity varies seasonally, with B. asper becoming less active in colder and dryer months. Terciopelos are most often found near river and stream banks, basking in the sun during the day and under forest cover ready to ambush during the night. The viper also exhibits an S-coiled defense display when threatened by another species. Juveniles are known to climb trees and also to exhibit caudal luring, a use of their different colored tail tips to lure prey. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004; Sasa, et al., 2009)

Key Behaviors
terricolous; nocturnal ; sedentary ; solitary

Home Range

Because B. asper is highly sedentary, ambushing to capture prey, the viper usually does not stray more than 1200 m over a two-night period and maintains a much smaller activity center than its home range. Terciopelos only leave this activity center in the absence of food or sufficient humidity. They have an estimated territory range of 37,100 m. (Sasa, et al., 2009)

Communication and Perception

Communication and perception is not well studied in Bothrops colombiensis. However, the species is named for its loreal heat-sensing pit which it uses at night to detect prey. Males follow females to show they are interested in mating, and will exhibit head-bobbing motions if the female allows him to approach.

Like all snakes, Bothrops colombiensis perceives its environment through visual, infrared, tactile, and chemical stimuli. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004; Sasa, et al., 2009)

Communication Channels
visual

Perception Channels
visual ; infrared/heat ; tactile ; chemical

Food Habits

Bothrops colombiensis, due to its vast distribution, feeds on a wide variety of prey. The size, strength, and extremely toxic venom make terciopelos effective predators. In adult years, they have been known to feed on mammals, amphibians, and reptiles, but are not limited to these groups. Juveniles feed on small lizards and even large insects such as Scolopendra angulata.

In Costa Rica, adults have been known to feed on rats (Rattus rattus), opossums (Caluromys derbianus and Didelphis marsupialis), and other rodents, as well as rabbits (Sylvilagus brasiliensis), frogs (Lithobates forreri) and geckos (Gonatodes albogularis). In Ecuador they primarily feed on rodents. On the island of Trinidad, Bothrops colombiensis has been known to feed on everything from rodents and other small mammals, lizards, frogs and birds, or even crayfish. These species include Didelphis marsupialis and Ninia atrata. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004)

Primary Diet
carnivore (Eats terrestrial vertebrates)

Animal Foods
birds; mammals; amphibians; reptiles; insects; aquatic crustaceans

Predation

Known Predators


Though well camouflaged, large, and venomous Bothrops colombiensis has many predators, notably mussuranas (Clelia clelia). Mussuranas are snakes known to use their own venom and constrictive abilities to prey on other snakes. The blood of Clelia clelia contains an inhibitor of some the powerful toxins of the venom of terciopelos. Raptors, such as laughing falcons (Herpetotheres cacchinans), swallow-tailed kites (Elanoides forficatus), and crane hawks (Geranospiza caerulescens) are also important predators of terciopelos. The most effective are laughing falcons which can successfully defeat incredibly large female terciopelos. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004)

Those less effective predators which can only feed on small to medium-sized terciopelos include mammalian predators such as hog-nosed skunks (Conepatus leuconotus), raccoons (Procyon lotor), and coatis Nasua nasua and Nasua narica. The more susceptible juveniles are preyed upon by many smaller raptors including roadside hawks (Buteo magnirostris). Some crabs, the spider Phoneutria, and tarantulas are suspected to prey on neonates. (Sasa, et al., 2009)

Anti-predator Adaptations
cryptic

Ecosystem Roles

Bothrops colombiensis has many parasites. Internal parasites include the nematodes Filaria, Rhabdias vellardi, Kalicephalus inermes, trematodes (Ochetosoma genus), and flatworms (Acanthocephala). Parasitic protozoans include hemogregarianes as well as amoeba and amoeba-like organisms. These have been known to cause gastroenteritis and hepatitis, among other illnesses. External parasites include several ticks, including Amblyoma savanae and Amblyoma dissimile, a known vector of hemogregarianes. (Sasa, et al., 2009)

Terciopelos serve as prey to many species, and likely play a role in supporting local populations. Mussuranas, as well as many raptors including laughing falcons (Herpetotheres cacchinans), swallow-tailed kites (Elanoides forficatus), and crane hawks (Geranospiza caerulescens) prey upon terciopelos. Predators that prey on small terciopelos include mammalian predators such as hog-nosed skunks (Conepatus leuconotus), the coatis Nasua nasua and Nasua narica and racoons (Procyon lotor). Juveniles are preyed upon by many smaller raptors including roadside hawks (Buteo magnirostris). Some crabs and tarantulas prey on neonates. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004)

Bothrops colombiensis are also important predators in their ecosystems and thus impact local populations of prey species as well. Juveniles feed on small lizards and even large insects such as Scolopendra angulata. Adults feed on rats (Rattus rattus), opossums (Caluromys derbianus and Didelphis marsupialis), and other rodents, as well as rabbits (Sylviagus brasiliensis), frogs (Lithobates forreri) and geckos (Gonatodes albogularis). (Sasa, et al., 2009)

Commensal/Parasitic Species

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

Terciopelos feed on small rats and other seed eaters which are detrimental to farmers. The venom has potential pharmacological implications and continues to be of promise. (Sasa, et al., 2009)

Positive Impacts
source of medicine or drug ; controls pest population

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

Bothrops colombiensis is responsible for the most deaths by venomous snakes in most of its geographic range. Often living close to humans in lowland areas and having highly-toxic venom results in a significant impact in the areas it inhabits. Its well studied venom is hemorrhagic, myonecrotic and proteolytic. It can cause incredible pain, necrosis of the region, and progressive edema. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004)

Negative Impacts
injures humans (bites or stings, venomous )

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species [Link]
Not Evaluated.

CITES [Link]
No special status

Urbanization, deforestation, contamination, and agriculture have resulted in the declining number of Bothrops colombiensis in Ecuador. In spite of this, some are able to live and even thrive in open and suburban zones. It has been suggested that the Ecuadorian B. asper be placed as a species of "Least Concern" on the IUCN Redlist, though the species is currently not evaluated. (Cisneros-Heredia and Touzet, 2004)

In Costa Rica, human impact has seemed to favor Bothrops colombiensis. Terciopelos have been able to prosper in certain agricultural fields such as banana, cacao and coffee. Even though they are adaptable, some areas have seen a decline which is thought to stem from more drastic environmental changes and decline of prey. (Sasa, et al., 2009)

Other Comments

Common Names: Terciopelos, barbas amarillas, fer de lance, cola de hueso, rabo de hueso, cola blanca, yellow-jaw tommygoff, cuatronarices, equis, cachete de punica, cascabelle, among many others. (Campbell and Lamar, 2004; Sasa, et al., 2009)

For More Information

Find Bothrops asper information at

Contributors

Kelly Brown (author), University of Michigan, Phil Myers (editor), University of Michigan, Rachelle Sterling (editor), University of Michigan, Animal Diversity Web Editor.

References

2010. "CalPhotos: Bothrops Asper" (On-line). CalPhotos. Accessed February 22, 2010 at http://calphotos.berkeley.edu/cgi/img_query?stat=BROWSE&query_src=photos_fauna_sci-Reptile&where-lifeform=Reptile&where-taxon=Bothrops+asper&title_tag=Bothrops+asper.

Alape-Girón, A., L. Sanz, J. Escolano, M. Flores-Díaz, M. Madrigal, M. Sasa, J. Calvete. 2008. Snake Venomics of the Lancehead Pitviper Bothrops asper: Geographic, Individual, and Ontogenetic Variations. Journal of Proteome Research, Volume 7: 3556-3571.

Aldridge, R., D. Duvall. 2002. EVOLUTION OF THE MATING SEASON IN THE PITVIPERS OF NORTH AMERICA. Herpetological Monographs, Volume 16/Issue 1: 1-25. Accessed February 19, 2010 at http://www.hljournals.org/perlserv/?request=res-loc&uri=urn%3Aap%3Apdf%3Adoi%3A10.1655%2F0733-1347%282002%29016%5B0001%3AEOTMSI%5D2.0.CO%3B2.

Badilla, B., F. Chaves, G. Mora, L. Poveda. 2006. Edema induced by Bothrops asper (Squamata: Viperidae) snake venom and its inhibition by Costa Rican plant extracts. Revista de biología tropical, Volume 54/Issue 2: 245-252.

Bowler, J. 1977. Longevity of reptiles and amphibians in North American collections as of 1 November, 1975. Oxford, Ohio: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles.

Campbell, J., W. Lamar. 2004. The Venomous Reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. China: Cornell University Press.

Cisneros-Heredia, D., J. Touzet. 2004. Distribution and conservation status of Bothrops asper (GARMAN, 1884) in Ecuador. Herpetozoa, 17/(3/4): 135-141. Accessed March 21, 2010 at http://www.cisneros-heredia.org/pdfs/2004_Bothrops_asper.pdf.

Fernández, J., J. Gutiérrez, Y. Angulo, L. Sanz, P. Juárez, J. Calvete, B. Lomonte. 2009. Isolation of an acidic phospholipase A(2) from the venom of the snake Bothrops asper of Costa Rica: Biochemical and toxicological characterization. Biochimie, Volume 92/Issue 3: 273-283. Accessed February 22, 2010 at http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6VRJ-4Y05DNB-2-1&_cdi=6236&_user=99318&_pii=S030090840900337X&_orig=search&_coverDate=03%2F31%2F2010&_sk=999079996&view=c&wchp=dGLzVlz-zSkWb&md5=d5b4c180c206c3ae87ec945843a246d3&ie=/sdarticle.pdf.

Gutiérrez, J., G. León, G. Rojas, B. Lomonte, A. Rucavado, F. Chaves. 1998. Neutralization of local tissue damage induced by Bothrops asper (terciopelo) snake venom. Toxicon, Volume 36/Issue 11: 1529-1538.

Hardy, D. 1994. Bothrops asper (Viperidae) Snakebite and Field Researchers in Middle American. Biotropica, Volume 26/Issue 2: 198-207. Accessed February 22, 2010 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2388809.

Martins, M., M. Araujo, R. Sawaya, R. Nunes. 2002. Diversity and evolution of macrohabitat use, body size and morphology in a monophyletic group of Neotropical pitvipers (Bothrops). Journal of Zoology, Volume 254/Issue 4: 529-538.

O'Shea, M. 2005. Venomous Snakes of the World. Singapore: Pica Digital Pte Ltd, Singapore.

Saldarriaga-Córdoba, M., M. Sasa, R. Pardo, M. Méndez. 2009. Phenotypic differences in a cryptic predator: Factors influencing morphological variation in the terciopelo Bothrops asper (Garman, 1884; Serpentes: Viperidae). Toxicon, 54: 923-937. Accessed March 21, 2010 at http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6TCS-4WMDHFD-3-1&_cdi=5178&_user=99318&_pii=S0041010109003286&_orig=search&_coverDate=12%2F01%2F2009&_sk=999459992&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlz-zSkWb&md5=4fa8aac4102ee5ef8690f1a824eb1197&ie=/sdarticle.pdf.

Sasa, M., R. Barrentes. 1998. Variation in Populations of Bothrops asper (Serpentes: Viperidae) in Costa Rica. Herpetological Monographs, Volume 54/Issue 4: 462-469. Accessed February 22, 2010 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3893440.

Sasa, M., D. Wasko, W. Lamar. 2009. Natural history of the terciopelo Bothrops asper (Serpentes: Viperidae) in Costa Rica. Toxicon, Volume 54/Issue 7: 904-922. Accessed February 22, 2010 at http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6TCS-4WMDHFD-3-1&_cdi=5178&_user=99318&_pii=S0041010109003286&_orig=search&_coverDate=12%2F01%2F2009&_sk=999459992&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlz-zSkzk&md5=4fa8aac4102ee5ef8690f1a824eb1197&ie=/sdarticle.pdf.

Schuett, G., M. Douglas, M. Höggren, H. Greene. 2002. Biology of The Vipers. Eagle Mountain, Utah: Eagle Mountain Publishing.

Smith, H. 1958. Handlist of the Snakes of Panama. Herpetologica, Volume 14/Issue 4: 222-224. Accessed February 15, 2010 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3890493.

Smith, H., K. Larsen. 1974. The Gender of Generic Names Ending in -ops. Journal of Herpetology, Volume 8/Issue 4: 375. Accessed February 22, 2010 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1562909.

Solórzano, A., L. Cerdas. 1989. Reproductive Biology and Distribution of the Terciopelo, Bothrops asper Garman (Serpentes: Viperidae), in Costa Rica. Herpetologica, Volume 45/Issue 4: 444-450. Accessed February 21, 2010 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3892835.

United States Navy, 1962. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Wasko, D. 2009. SPATIAL AND FEEDING ECOLOGY OF THE FER-DE-LANCE (BOTHROPS ASPER) IN COSTA RICA. A Dissertation, n/a: 1-116. Accessed February 22, 2010 at http://etd.library.miami.edu/theses/available/etd-04092009-145443/unrestricted/dwaskoSp09.pdf.

White, N. 2009. Fer-de-Lance: Master Killer!. New York, NY: Bearport Publishing Company, Incorporated.

Wüster, W., M. Da Graça Salomáo, J. Adrián Quijada-Mascarenñas, R. Thorpe, BBBSP. 2002. Origins and Evolution of the South American Pitviper Fauna: Evidence From Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Analysis. Pp. 111-128 in B Schuett, M Höggren, M Douglas, H Greene, eds. Biology of The Vipers. New York, NY: Eagle Mountain Publishing.

To cite this page: Brown, K. 2011. "Bothrops asper" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed May 31, 2012 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Bothrops_asper.html

Disclaimer: The Animal Diversity Web is an educational resource written largely by and for college students. ADW doesn't cover all species in the world, nor does it include all the latest scientific information about organisms we describe. Though we edit our accounts for accuracy, we cannot guarantee all information in those accounts. While ADW staff and contributors provide references to books and websites that we believe are reputable, we cannot necessarily endorse the contents of references beyond our control.

Other formats: OWL

Home  ¦  About Us  ¦  Special Topics  ¦  Teaching  ¦  About Animal Names  ¦  Help

Structured Inquiry Search — preview