Close relatives of (Miller, 2000)can live in waters with weak currents, and are often found near the surface of the water, where the concentration of algae, their food source, is highest.
These animals are called water fleas because their physical appearance and movements resemble those of land fleas. This common name also applies to 620 different species. The members of Eubosmina sp., which lack this structure. They also have a carapace, which looks like a folded shell that covers the animal and opens on both the ventral and posterior sides. The length of both mucro and carapace vary in season, decreasing in the summer due to increased predation risk with size. (DeMott and Kerfoot, 1982; Miller, 2000; Shaharudin and Saisho, 2011; Urabe, 1991; Zaret and Kerfoot, 1980)are sexually dimorphic; females have large antennules that curve back over the head which are absent in males. Females range in size from 0.4 to 0.6 mm long, while males range from 0.4 to 0.5 mm long. Both sexes have a mucro, a sharp point attached on their head which varies in length by location. The function of mucro in is unknown. However, the mucro serves to distinguish from their very close relative,
Water fleas are ectothermic. (Anestis, 2006)
When females lay eggs, they hatch to become juveniles. They are considered adults once they are larger than the smallest egg carrying female. (Jankowski, 2004)
Reproduction of Bosmina in temperate regions have shown they reproduce by using facultative parthenogenesis, allowing them to reproduce sexually or by parthenogenesis; wheras other Bosmina sp. in arctic lakes reproduce using obligate parthenogenesis, meaning they can only reproduce asexually. breed throughout the year but are more active from May to June and August to September when algae grows more rapidly. Their reproductive rates are dependent upon how much food is available. (Bothar, 1986; Hanazato and Yasuno, 1987; Little, et al., 1997; Urabe, 1991)is highly dependent on the environment. When go through parthenogenesis, a form of asexual reproduction, they produce the same gender that of the parent, however there is little information available about parthenogenesis of . Studies of
Female (Urabe, 1991)carry the eggs (up to two eggs) in their brood pouch until the eggs hatch and become free living and independent.
There is little information available on the communication and perception of Daphnia sp. communicate using chemical signals, and have one black compound eye that detects light. (Larsson and Dodson, 1993; McCoole, et al., 2011); however, its closely related species,
Cyclotella, Microcystis, and Chlorella. Filter-feeding is achieved by five pairs of thoracic limbs that are developed for grasping food particles. Large particles can be grasped by the first three thoracic limbs, while the fourth and fifth pairs filter small particles. The first two pairs of thoracic limbs can be used to push the food inside the food groove, while the third to fifth pairs act as filter. In this filter mechanism, small food particles are collected and pushed into the food groove. The feeding system of Bosmina sp. is more efficient in low food densities. The filter structure of other members of the genus Bosmina. is known to be poorly developed, and they are generally less efficient filter feeders than Daphnia sp. They are generally not selective feeders; however, when they have to compete with Daphnia species they switch their preferences. (Branstrator and Lehman, 1991; DeMott and Kerfoot, 1982; Hanazato and Yasuno, 1987)are mainly filter feeders. They eat protozoa, diatoms, and other alge ranging in size from 10 to 15 µm. They prey on
Chaoborus, cyclopoid copepods, Mysis relicta, Leptodora kindtii, Epischura lacustris, Limnocalanus macrurus, and Senecella calanoides. They are also an important primary food source for planktivorous fish, including young whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis).is preyed upon many different invertebrate predators, such as
During daylight these animals sometimes form dense aggregations, as many as 9000 individuals per liter of water. These groups often significantly reduce the food supply in their location but stay together anyway until night. Because they only group together in daylight, and do so even when this reduces food availability, it is believed that this behavior is predator avoidance, possibly a "Selfish Herd" phenomenon. (Branstrator and Lehman, 1991; Jakobsen and Johnsen, 1988)
There is no direct positive importance for humans. However, (Acharya, et al., 2005)play important role in the food web as they are a good source of food for many aquatic organisms. Also, because they filter-feed on algae, they can improve water clarity.
Too many (Miller, 2000)concentrated in one area can reduce the oxygen level in the water, which can have a negative impact on fishes.
are known to thrive in ponds and lakes. They are not considered to require conservation efforts, and have not been evaluated by the IUCN Red List program.
Andy Lee (author), University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Alison Gould (editor), University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, George Hammond (editor), Animal Diversity Web Staff.
living in sub-Saharan Africa (south of 30 degrees north) and Madagascar.
living in the Nearctic biogeographic province, the northern part of the New World. This includes Greenland, the Canadian Arctic islands, and all of the North American as far south as the highlands of central Mexico.
living in the southern part of the New World. In other words, Central and South America.
living in the northern part of the Old World. In otherwords, Europe and Asia and northern Africa.
reproduction that is not sexual; that is, reproduction that does not include recombining the genotypes of two parents
having body symmetry such that the animal can be divided in one plane into two mirror-image halves. Animals with bilateral symmetry have dorsal and ventral sides, as well as anterior and posterior ends. Synapomorphy of the Bilateria.
a wetland area rich in accumulated plant material and with acidic soils surrounding a body of open water. Bogs have a flora dominated by sedges, heaths, and sphagnum.
uses smells or other chemicals to communicate
animals which must use heat acquired from the environment and behavioral adaptations to regulate body temperature
a method of feeding where small food particles are filtered from the surrounding water by various mechanisms. Used mainly by aquatic invertebrates, especially plankton, but also by baleen whales.
mainly lives in water that is not salty.
An animal that eats mainly plants or parts of plants.
the area of shoreline influenced mainly by the tides, between the highest and lowest reaches of the tide. An aquatic habitat.
offspring are produced in more than one group (litters, clutches, etc.) and across multiple seasons (or other periods hospitable to reproduction). Iteroparous animals must, by definition, survive over multiple seasons (or periodic condition changes).
marshes are wetland areas often dominated by grasses and reeds.
having the capacity to move from one place to another.
specialized for swimming
reproduction in which eggs are released by the female; development of offspring occurs outside the mother's body.
development takes place in an unfertilized egg
photosynthetic or plant constituent of plankton; mainly unicellular algae. (Compare to zooplankton.)
an animal that mainly eats plankton
the kind of polygamy in which a female pairs with several males, each of which also pairs with several different females.
reproduction that includes combining the genetic contribution of two individuals, a male and a female
a wetland area that may be permanently or intermittently covered in water, often dominated by woody vegetation.
that region of the Earth between 23.5 degrees North and 60 degrees North (between the Tropic of Cancer and the Arctic Circle) and between 23.5 degrees South and 60 degrees South (between the Tropic of Capricorn and the Antarctic Circle).
the region of the earth that surrounds the equator, from 23.5 degrees north to 23.5 degrees south.
uses sight to communicate
breeding takes place throughout the year
Acharya, K., J. Jack, P. Bukaveckas. 2005. Dietary effects on life history traits of riverine Bosmina. Freshwater Biology, 50: 965-975.
Anestis, M. 2006. AP Biology. New York City, NY: McGrawHill.
Balcer, M., N. Korda, S. Dodson. 1984. Zooplankton of the Great Lakes: A Guide to the Identification and Ecology of the Comon Crustacean Species. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Pres..
Bothar, A. 1986. POPULATION-DYNAMICS AND ESTIMATION OF PRODUCTION IN BOSMINA-LONGIROSTRIS (MULLER,O.F.) IN THE RIVER DANUBE (DANUBIALIA HUNGARICA, CVIII). Hydrobiologia, 140/2: 97-104.
Bothar, A. 1987. THE ESTIMATION OF PRODUCTION AND MORTALITY OF BOSMINA-LONGIROSTRIS (MULLER,O.F.) IN THE RIVER DANUBE (DANUBIALIA HUNGARICA, CIX). Hydrobiologia, 145: 285-291.
Branstrator, D., J. Lehman. 1991. INVERTEBRATE PREDATION IN LAKE-MICHIGAN - REGULATION OF BOSMINA-LONGIROSTRIS BY LEPTODORA-KINDTII. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 36/3: 483-495. Accessed February 03, 2012 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2837513.
De Melo, R., P. Hebert. 1994. A TAXONOMIC REEVALUATION OF NORTH-AMERICAN BOSMINIDAE. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 72/10: 1808-1825.
DeMott, W., C. Kerfoot. 1982. Competition Among Cladocerans: Nature of the Interaction Between Bosmina and Daphnia. Ecology, 63/6: 1949-1966.
Ertan, O., Z. Guclu, O. Erdogan, S. Savas, I. Gulle. 2011. Population Growth of Bosmina longirostris Fed Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus subspicatus in Different Densities. ISRAELI JOURNAL OF AQUACULTURE-BAMIDGEH, 63: 1-7.
Genung, A. 2012. "Zooplankton of the Great Lakes" (On-line). Central Michigan University. Accessed March 25, 2012 at http://www.cst.cmich.edu/users/mcnau1as/zooplankton%20web/bosmina/bosmina.html.
Hanazato, T., M. Yasuno. 1987. EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON COMPETITION BETWEEN BOSMINA-LONGIROSTRIS AND BOSMINA-FATALIS. Hydrobiologia, 154: 189-199.
Jakobsen, P., G. Johnsen. 1988. THE INFLUENCE OF FOOD LIMITATION ON SWARMING BEHAVIOR IN THE WATERFLEA BOSMINA-LONGISPINA. Anim. Behav., 36: 991-995.
Jankowski, T. 2004. Predation of freshwater jellyfish on Bosmina: the consequences for population dynamics, body size, and morphology. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 530/SI: 521-528.
Kotov, A., S. Ishida, D. Taylor. 2009. Revision of the genus Bosmina Baird, 1845 (Cladocera: Bosminidae), based on evidence from male morphological characters and molecular phylogenies. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156/1: 1-51.
Larsson, P., S. Dodson. 1993. INVITED REVIEW - CHEMICAL COMMUNICATION IN PLANKTONIC ANIMALS. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 129/2: 129-155.
Little, T., R. Demelo, D. Taylor, P. Hebert. 1997. Genetic Characterization of an Arctic Zooplankter: Insights into Geographic Polyploidy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 264/1386: 1363-1370.
Lord, H., R. Lagergren, J. Svensson, N. Lundgvist. 2006. Sexual dimorphism in Bosmina: The role of morphology, drag, and swimming. Ecology, 87/3: 788-795.
McCoole, M., K. Baer, A. Christie. 2011. Histaminergic signaling in the central nervous system of Daphnia and a role for it in the control of phototactic behavior. Journal of Experimental Biology, 214/10: 1773-1782.
Miller, C. 2000. "Daphnia pulex" (On-line). Animal Diversity Web. Accessed March 25, 2012 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Daphnia_pulex.html.
Per, J., J. Geir. 1988. THE INFLUENCE OF FOOD LIMITATION ON SWARMING BEHAVIOR IN THE WATERFLEA BOSMINA-LONGISPINA. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 36: 991-995.
Sakamoto, M., K. Chang, T. Hanazato. 2007. Plastic phenotypes of antennule shape in Bosmina longirostris controlled by physical stimuli from predators. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 52/5: 2072-2078.
Sakamoto, M., T. Hanazato. 2009. Proximate factors controlling the morphologic plasticity of Bosmina: linking artificial laboratory treatments and natural conditions. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 617: 171-179.
Sakamoto, M., T. Hanzato. 2008. Antennule shape and body size of Bosmina: key factors determining its vulnerability of predacious Copepoda. LIMNOLOGY, 9/1: 27-34.
Shaharudin, R., T. Saisho. 2011. Cyclomorphism in Bosmina longirostris (Crustacea:Cladocera) from Lake Ikeda, Japan. SAINS MALAYSIANA, 40/6: 543-547.
Tanera, M., J. Carletona, M. Wellmana. 2011. Integrated model projections of climate change impacts on a North American lake. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 222/18: 3380-3393.
Threlkeld, S. 1981. THE RECOLONIZATION OF LAKE TAHOE BY BOSMINA-LONGIROSTRIS - EVALUATING THE IMPORTANCE OF REDUCED MYSIS-RELICTA POPULATION. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 26/3: 433-444.
Urabe, J. 1991. EFFECT OF FOOD CONCENTRATION ON GROWTH, REPRODUCTION AND SURVIVORSHIP OF BOSMINA-LONGIROSTRIS (CLADOCERA) - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY. Freshwater Biology, 25/1: 1-8.
Von Ende, C., D. Dempsey. 1981. APPARENT EXCLUSION OF THE CLADOCERAN BOSMINA-LONGIROSTRIS BY INVERTEBRATE PREDATOR CHAOBORUS-AMERICANUS. AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 105/2: 240-248.
Zaret, R., C. Kerfoot. 1980. SHAPE AND SWIMMING TECHNIQUE OF BOSMINA-LONGIROSTRIS. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 25/1: 126-133.
Zaret, T., C. Kerfoot. 1975. FISH PREDATION ON BOSMINA-LONGIROSTRIS - BODY-SIZE SELECTION VERSUS VISIBILITY SELECTION. ECOLOGY, 56/1: 232-237.